Black Rain

It's one of the plugin addons that I recently enabled because it does its job at preventing people from joining a team when the game is live but the auto-join function at the teammenu somehow forces you to join a team if you don't click spectate. I'm gonna look into this because I really don't want to see people accidentally joining a team during the live match, it causes people to go back to spectate and give a $300 suicide bonus thanks to some shitty update from Valve. I'll look into this and post back later.

Happy birthday Minus ya oldfag xd Happy birthday Brandon!

What Goku said ^ if there's gonna be a rule about one death game then it's gonna lead to a whole clusterfuck of what death games would/wouldn't be allowed, which would be a pointless rule imo. The purpose of a death game is to risk to see if you win or lose. If you don't like how the CT is leading it then I'd say just skip playing the death game lol

Love the layout but don't think this is T1-T2

@Bread knows what I've been up to lately LOL

I forgot this was a thing lol. Overwatch has taken over my life and made me forget about everything else. I'll do the match soon with No Pants and work it out ASAP

We already played dm maps in the last event.

English is probably not his first language. Be nice

Co-op missions are fun and a great way to get people to play together but it'll just be another server that will be played a lot for the first 2-3 days and then eventually be a gimmick server with little-to-none activity from the player base interested. As you already know, you can just make your own custom lobby from the main menu with up to 10 players including yourself so you're much better off enjoying co-op that way over having an SG server for it. As for making it an MGT type of event, it's possible and can be looked into the future but for it being a dedicated server, we're going to have to say no.

I blame SwiftKey -_- gr8 keyboard sometimes. It just loves to randomly insert words in the middle of when I'm typing on my phone

The thread doesn't exist because Metal is remaking the thread in the future to host the torunamenttournament.

You can donate either by PayPal or skins. Subscriber is our most popular form of donating to the community. You get the benefit of subscriber perks on servers, TeamSpeak and the forums if you wish do to this way. 1) PayPal will be a monthly subscription of $5. You can cancel this anytime under your statement in PayPal if you need to. Link is this: http://www.steam-gamers.net/subscribeform.php 2) Donating by skins has a minimum payment of $15. For the $15 you donate, each skin should not be worth less than $5 if you plan to donate multiple skins instead of one $15 skin. Link is here https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffer/new/?partner=24282423&token=AabB_b6D For more information about donations, you can read here: http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=63396

It's really not fair to make this a rule. Just because our covers are blown doesn't mean we should be punishing those that are either excited or relieved to see an admin on to deal with rule breakers. If those players are not breaking the rules in the first place then I don't see it's fair to punish them for wanting to get rid of rule breakers. Like Ghost said, it hurts the players more than it hurts the admins. The only positive outcomes to this situation are that the offender stops once an admin's cover is blown or if the repeated offender continues and gets punished by the admin in the end. I'm just gonna throw this here:

No matter what we'll never add an auto-bhop function. The settings on the server already allow people to bhop with ease. Adding auto-bhop will make it worse for everyone else who struggles to bhop in the first place. Why? 1) the really good bhoppers are going to destroy everyone in the server with it, making it much more difficult to try to kill them; 2) it's not only going to encourage people to try to bhop more on minigames but it'll could lead to tons of potential delays in rounds.

@Vinyl look at all the pretty colors in that really old screenshot!

http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=67241 Silly Jr_Donkey

@Stunningjam, you're a doofus [video=youtube;ZuKM1G6-7gY] Fix the stairs for that area too pls. I hated it back for GMod and people who never played this map before will hate it too lol. If you extend the height for the stairs properly or just replace it with a ladder then that's fine. Definitely fix the issue from the video. Rejected till you get a fixed version ready.

I mentioned this to @Bread before and we discussed how we should have Course replaced because it's been really struggling to get a decent amount of players interested in playing. It was great for the first few weeks but it died down really badly after that. Once in a while, I'll see 2-3 people on it trying it out but after that its back to being left in the dust. I thought it would've been a good idea to replace Course completely with a different game mode and bhop could seem fitting to try at this point. It's hard to get a population going into course because I only know very few people actually like to play it, and they don't even play it anymore... The idea of Easy Bhop Tier 1-2 or 1-3 works imo.

@Metal he beat you to it. Ban the lamie?

I mean yeah that's obvious and I understand and agree with that statement for the rule. Once a T already does damage then he/she is KOS but whenever there is a knife fight then it's usually acknowledged that those two people are going to be having a fight to see who wins. I was just saying in situations like knife fights, CTs usually acknowledge that theres gonna be a 1 vs 1 and they normally let it play out. But if you're saying it's okay to kill a T during the middle of an LR because he/she inflicts some damage to the CT that's involved in the LR, then how is it fair to the T that wants to finish the LR? Just wondering because I'm used to seeing the fact that Ts normally get to complete their LRs before dying in the middle of it.

Ur a qtpi it's ok

Yes, but your situation was different from that from what Bubblez is saying, no? o.o From what I understood was that a T and CT were in a knife fight for an LR. A second CT killed the T as a freekill, you slayed the second CT for it and yourself. In that situation, you don't need to slay yourself because you're following admin protocol of a freekill during the round. For the rule you listed, I think it's referring to if the T that's in the middle of an LR like knife fight and knives a different CT that isn't part of the LR then it's KOSable and okay to kill the T. I just don't get why you slayed yourself if you were following protocol of a freekill cos you weren't really interfering as a T. You were only interfering as an admin and doing your job xD

Was gonna bring this up in the next CA meeting :L

I could've sworn an admin doesn't need to slay themselves if they're slaying someone else who interfered and freekilled. No one ever did this is CS:S and this is the first time I'm hearing it for GO.

Our boy Elemental is growing up :') he's a man now guise CONGRATS ELEEEEE =D