Lokibelowkey

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm sure

@Black Rain @Cept For Her

False, it should be "Loki > Everyone" mainly because it's true

I'm gonna be the only one to use proper grammar in here. @Charliere and I will be partnering up.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]18614[/ATTACH] As I said I am not that good at carving and I did it in an hour and a half but here is my submission.

There's an old man dressed as Yoda using a cane to walk and talking like Yoda handing candy to children at my school, great Halloween so far. Hope y'all are having an equally good Halloween.

@Charliere "i am a virgin saint" "yim so asyposet"

I am addressing the fact that the order was on a technical basis unreasonable and the rule doesn't say that orders that are impossible to execute are unreasonable. I feel like it should be changed, I do agree that it is a bad request to keep a stuck person alive the whole five minutes but it just made me realize that in my opinion the rule should be updated to include impossible orders.

I have been having this glitch happen to me for a while now but I'll press a button to get guns and it won't give me anything. [ATTACH=CONFIG]18603[/ATTACH]

it may not work for you, but binding with spaces in the command and to bind multiple things to one key is useful so ill run it down just to make sure you were doing it correctly. ex. bind k "say hello; +reload" 1. (k) is the key you want to bind most people know this 2. the first (") is after the key to start a command chain or just a command with spaces so it takes all the words in your bind instead of the first word of your command(s) 3. the (;) is to separate commands and it will do it in the order of left to right 4. the last (") will end the quotation ending the commands and will use everything inside the quotations if you did it correctly that's great and if you didn't know some stuff i just ran over, you now know it that's great too.

Am so sorry I am doing something for the entire day tomorrow I shan't be able to attend this is the third event I've wanted to growth but couldn't because of timing

Factual this needs to be recognized.

No it is just a server of JB instead of all of SG it's not replacing anything it's just another avenue for people to communicate but on the subject of JB and for JB members.

Gonna leave that there and can't wait when we tested it, it was fun and exciting this is going to be great. Everyone and anyone should come and check it out this is going to be epic.

During a round of be_jail_electric_razor_go someone spawned in the top left cell in the roof unable to move later in the round a ct gave him an order to go to pool which was impossible for him and killed him for not obeying the order and as stated in the rule "A reasonable order is an order that is straight-forward, clear, and to the point,easy to understand, not meant to confuse or trick, and give the prisoners enough time to abide to. Server rules required them" and he says that he wasn't giving an unreasonable order because he didn't trick them but i feel like it should be updated so that it has to be orders that aren't impossible to complete even though that's implied.

Yes i require a ghost chicken on my shoulder.

Even if it is an accident it is still a free kill, so you follow the same rules under free kill it being an accident doesn't change anything.

I agree let's try the map to see if the same problems persist and if they don't persist we can add it back into rotation!

i need help i cant stop listening to this

I got the coolest corgi

This is important because an admin is going undercover to catch people who break rules and if they are revealed by a regular it will tell people that normally would break rules to not that is a good thing normally but when someone breaks rules and a player asks a admin to come on and no one recorded the infraction they will have no proof to punish them. So going under cover allows them to gain evidence to punish them properly than the rule breaker stopping when the admin is revealed and won't get punished on the account of no evidence. I feel as though there are two different scenarios the one described above and one where they just don't want to tag up or sent tagged up just not tagged up for the purpose of punishing someone but just playing undercover. I definitely think that someone should be punished for the first scenario where they are attempting the punish someone and gain evidence and they reveal them it should be punishable and I'm split on the second scenario so I don's know what to say on it. Lastly I feel that either if the admin doesn't want to be revealed or to make it harder for someone to reveal them they should go to basic models and player effect along with changing their profile picture and username. and of course at that point if someone goes out of their way to reveal an admin and know full well of they situation, there should be some sort of punishment/warning.

Ooohh now this is getting interesting.

It has been happening again these are two different instances This happened today at 3:15 ADT on jb_summer_jail_v1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]18576[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]18577[/ATTACH] The second one happened today at roughly 8:10 ADT on ba_electric_razor_go [ATTACH=CONFIG]18578[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]18579[/ATTACH]

I was wondering how to apply for a team specifically the technical team?