Bullet Wound

Pretty sure thats called phishing. Also how did you fall for that..... And

I'd be more interested in our reaction to what would happen rather than what it actually is. A meteor is headed towards the earth? We gonna sit back and take it or are we gonna try and stop it? Or maybe try to get the fuck out of earth, maybe hide underground? Zombie Apocalypse? Whats your plan then? War or Nukes? Starvation or Overpopulation? Aliens? If we know anything about mankind its that when it comes to self-preservation.....well we can do anything.

People who are intolerant of other people's culture. And the dutch.

Why the 15 day wait?

Since I can't edit it I'll do a fail double post. Do the first numbers matter more than the last ones. Exmaple : Number drawn is 3-6-8 I have 3-6-6 Someone else has 2-6-8 We both have 2 numbers, so are we tied, or does the person with the firsts numbers win? (Or will you redraw) Edit.....Yea not fail double post

3-6-6 BUT I WILL NEVER THANK YOUR POST, EVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. However I agree to the rules

Every time I see your name I think of a carrot.... Can we call you carrot?

Well fuck you too then.

Fixed.

Translate "Fuck You" for me. Swear words are always useful in all languages.

Google sure has wisdom.

These were all pretty much unwritten rules that were followed already (apart from being kick for camping and killing all Ts as the last CTs). Good they're actual rules now, hopefully it doesn't backfire.

Water balloons filled with hot sauce. Or piss.

I am no longer an admin, so add me

I had already found it on TL forums

I didn't know we were worth money and could be bought out lol.

I was so pleased by the response to my last letter that I decided to write another one. Don't worry; I have plenty of new stuff to say about Women's Rights and its secret police. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: Women's Rights's goal is to take the focus off the real issues. This is abject sectarianism! That doesn't necessarily mean that Women's Rights dances to the tune of obstreperous poststructuralism, although it might. Rather, it means that Women's Rights has been making a ham-handed effort to show that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. I'm guessing that most people are starting to realize that such claims are a distortion of the truth and that we desperately need to combat these lies by supplying the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into cameralism. Perhaps it is within human nature to be at least part disaffected and part insecure, but it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Women's Rights distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its current opinions. We must lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight. We must induce Women's Rights to perceive its errors of perception and judgment and make it realize that its den of thieves is a distant cousin of the communist political organizations that were responsible for the murders of at least 90 million people. And we must plant markers that define the limits of what is wanton and what is not. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living credo. I lol'd