Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Breblo

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

About Breblo

Breblo's Achievements

  1. Hence on "Alot", I do want warning shots removed but some people cannot aim, I am just point out the fact on quite a few of the CT's that play This is a non relevant topic to the warning shots removal thread. Lets keep that topic there and leave this topic to this song.
  2. This video sure does remind me of alot of the CT's on PB Enjoy! -> -Breblo
  3. i like begging other terrorists for pistols and sniping cts from range
  4. As far as I know, I have been slayed for killing people with a holstered PRIMARY. I have been told many times that if someone has a holstered primary they must be warned.
  5. This thread is getting off topic. We are trying to come to a verdict about the warning shot rule. Please if anything it needs to be reworded
  6. Or maybe CT's cannot camp unless he is the LAST CT and more then 3 other T's are alive.
  7. I am not sure who wanted it to be added but I am sure that most of the ACTIVE users want something done about it, either removed or reworded.
  8. This thread is in regards to the new Warning Shots are required rule. This rule has its good times and its bad times. It makes every Terrorists job easier and every Counter-Terrorists job 10x harder. As we know being a Counter-Terrorist is hard enough as it is. I believe that this warning shot rule was put into affect by people who probably don't play Prison Break. Which is why, I would say 60-75% of the PB population do not like it. With warning shots we can no longer kill people for not following rules. What they are doing may seem as a non rebellious act but I would say 85% of the time it WILL lead to a rebellious act. Which leaves Counter-Terrorists stuck because people could just say, Blah blah, I didn't hear the rules or I was getting the phone! This rule needs a major rethinking or a modification. If it is wanted to keep this rule you could possibly change it to "Warning shots are required unless a CT clearly states if you do not do something or if you go somewhere you will die unconditionally" I, and probably most of the PB community would greatly appreciate the reconsideration of this rule. Thank you, Breblo
×
×
  • Create New...