jamison.webster

The deathadder was a good choice, ive had no problems with mine, and my css skills have much improved since i got the deathadder, i dont think you will have any regrets

Herp'n mah Derp like yea!

draw a person farting so hard that they achieve lift-off

draw a picture of your favorite thing to do(activity, not a person/thing/animal) xD

cookies plz

How can the player-base help support this transition??

Thanks Haggard for everything you do, and for the great Firefights in the reg server.

Kaos, i pwn u with the default crosshair, green, and small. works 4 me

What are the specs for ur PC, and how bout this? http://www.compusa.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=6680906&CatId=3669

im kind of.....well.....all i can really say is "wow, just wow".

wow, thats a nice rig dude, Phenom II's are awesome, i really like my 940 x4.(got her to 4ghz on the same cooler as you). really impressive build, im envious lol

The enhance pointer precision ticbox. Microsoft has to make funny names for everything......but anywho, that ticbox just controls the mouse acceleration, and if left unselected, acceleration is disabled. Most people want this disabled for gaming, its pretty unsmooth and jerky acceleration.

lol, I game with a sensitivity of .8, with my Razer Deathadder set to 900dpi instead of 3500dpi(to reduce negative accel), and yes, at a sensitivity of 2-3 and more, the extra dpi is appreciated greatly and brings up your accuracy because your cross-hairs are no longer skipping pixels on-screen. And as far as the windows mouse setting goes, i left it at default(no filtering or interpolating), that sensitivity adjuster is a monster and really messes everything up.

The Xbox 360 can output video in 1920x1080, however 95% of games (MW2, any valve game, fallout 3, ect) output to a true resolution of 1280x720. this is due to the hardware restrictions of the xbox's relatively weak GPU. Microsoft knows about this and they compensate for this bottleneck using a process called scaling. scaling takes the 720p image rendered by the GPU and expands the image to fit a 1080p resolution. This allows the GPU to render 720p but have it "look" like 1080p. The draw-back to this method is that the image sent to the display is of lower quality and rather blocky, but from 15 feet away on your couch you don't notice this as much and the image looks relatively clear. Microsoft uses this trickery to claim full HD video games, yet still saves money by reducing the hardware requirements of the console. But by using a screen with a native 1280x720 resolution, you get the best image quality because the image isn't being scaled up or scaled down.

That's true, however, most mice with an extremely high dpi have a problem with negative acceleration if they are moved too quick and suffer from skipping. Also the user doesn't benefit from extra dpi and a low Sensitivity. A mouse with 900 dpi and an in-game sensitivity of 1 is just as smooth and accurate as a 5600 dpi mouse, however the 5600 dpi mouse requires less physical movement to rotate to player 360 degrees. The myth that more dpi improves your accuracy is untrue, because you can only be accurate down to a pixel on your screen. A mouse can't give you sub-pixel accuracy. the only time that more dpi benefits the player is if they play with a high sensitivity. A high sensitivity in-game and a 900 dpi mouse equals pixel skipping and a loss of accuracy. This is where a high dpi mouse comes in handy. High dpi just doesn't benefit low sensitivity players, as you can't be any more accurate than a pixel. Tons of people still swear by the old Microsoft intellimouse 3.0, which has 450 dpi, and is just as accurate and buttery smooth at a LOW in-game sensitivity as a Razer Mamba. My point is, is that low in-game sensitivity players shouldn't waste money thinking that a high dpi mouse will help them. I had to learn this the hard way