Jewpiter Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 2661 Joined: 02/11/08 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 Tax the obese. Link to comment
Creeping Death Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 1382 Joined: 06/08/08 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 that is FUBAR 1 Link to comment
b0red Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 4360 Joined: 04/25/09 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 This is a obamanation Link to comment
Runawayz Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 136 Joined: 05/25/09 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 Please don't post this in the politics section. That is for serious discussion. Leave it here so people won't be confused when they see a pile of ridiculous shit lying around in the Off Topic section. You don't even include sources for your claims, so how can anyone take you seriously when you overuse the "..." even more than I did back in the day. What you say comes off as a BAD chain letter as your comprehension on politics is lacking. lol before you go and talk shit about something you read on a forum then smash someone bc u dont feel like going to google and type it in yourself.. you should prob do that... but here are you links so u can simple click rather then click then type.. ALABAMA already has a fat tax.. hrm must be a real tax.. dont see why the prez might consider it eh? http://www.hubdub.com/m20372/Will_other_states_adopt_Alabamas_fat_tax_before_2010 other people are talking about it too... http://www.whyzzat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3476 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090523075749AAVC9uE hmm london fat tax? http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSL1254236520070712 rainwater tax... looks like Kentucky already has it hurr durr... http://www.scribd.com/doc/15457323/Council-Passes-New-Tax-on-Rain-Water-13-to-2 i mean really go type all of it into google..... i dont feel like doing deep research to prove to the people who dont believe it to be true that it has been TALKED ABOUT by Obama or atleast the media.... not saying they are all true but they are out there... oh and here is your TP tax... http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/07/toilet_paper_ta.html its not that hard to look shit up on your own kids... Link to comment
Italian Jew Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 4473 Joined: 11/26/07 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 lol before you go and talk shit about something you read on a forum then smash someone bc u dont feel like going to google and type it in yourself.. you should prob do that... but here are you links so u can simple click rather then click then type.. ALABAMA already has a fat tax.. hrm must be a real tax.. dont see why the prez might consider it eh? http://www.hubdub.com/m20372/Will_other_states_adopt_Alabamas_fat_tax_before_2010 other people are talking about it too... http://www.whyzzat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3476 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090523075749AAVC9uE hmm london fat tax? http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSL1254236520070712 rainwater tax... looks like Kentucky already has it hurr durr... http://www.scribd.com/doc/15457323/Council-Passes-New-Tax-on-Rain-Water-13-to-2 i mean really go type all of it into google..... i dont feel like doing deep research to prove to the people who dont believe it to be true that it has been TALKED ABOUT by Obama or atleast the media.... not saying they are all true but they are out there... oh and here is your TP tax... http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/07/toilet_paper_ta.html its not that hard to look shit up on your own kids... None of your articles are valid sources showing Obama wants those taxes in place. Your argument is that he is trying to do so and my complaint was that you didn't back up what you said. You still have not done that. My complaint was not centered on whether or not these things existed, just that Obama wasn't the ones behind them (if they really existed). All you have are articles saying that things have been done on either the State or Local level. And really, blogs or forums? We don't need anymore shithead opinions, we need facts. i dont feel like doing deep research to prove to the people who dont believe it to be true All that shows is your inability to back up your initial claim. Congratulations, you're still stumbling over your obviously crippled and biased rationale. 1 Link to comment
Slavic Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 1938 Joined: 09/15/07 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 (edited) *edit ^^Damn you Italian posting while I'm still typing. I knew I should of gone to typing school^^ lol before you go and talk shit about something you read on a forum then smash someone bc u dont feel like going to google and type it in yourself.. you should prob do that... but here are you links so u can simple click rather then click then type.. ALABAMA already has a fat tax.. hrm must be a real tax.. dont see why the prez might consider it eh? http://www.hubdub.com/m20372/Will_other_states_adopt_Alabamas_fat_tax_before_2010 other people are talking about it too... http://www.whyzzat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3476 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090523075749AAVC9uE hmm london fat tax? http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSL1254236520070712 rainwater tax... looks like Kentucky already has it hurr durr... http://www.scribd.com/doc/15457323/Council-Passes-New-Tax-on-Rain-Water-13-to-2 i mean really go type all of it into google..... i dont feel like doing deep research to prove to the people who dont believe it to be true that it has been TALKED ABOUT by Obama or atleast the media.... not saying they are all true but they are out there... oh and here is your TP tax... http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/07/toilet_paper_ta.html its not that hard to look shit up on your own kids... You honestly have no clue how to hold a proper debate works. YOU provide hard evidence for your stance. and after reading WE provide our rebuttal with hard evidence of our own. Don't get into a pissy fit because you posted some jibberish that you want to tell us about and get pissed because your lazy ass didn't feel like supporting your own arguments. So lets get this rolling. Your "Fat Tax" as it is "quoted" in your "article" is "quoted" because it is not a "tax" after all but a new state program. The program is designed to cut down on obesity within the state government. Seeing how most state employees are over paid and given ridiculously good benefit programs compared to their quality of work; I'd be glad to see them get into shape so that they don't bleed the taxpayer provided medicare program with their 3rd heart surgery because they don't know how to say NO after the 5th Big Mac. Your second link of "hard evidence" comes from a 2 month old forum post who's only link on the subject was to Wikipedia... The article on Rainfall Tax, is about a town in Kentucky called Lexington. First of all I know what your saying, "If it can happen in Lexington, then by god it could happen ANYWHERE!", but don't worry there is good news. The tax was passed because Lexington has been fined repeatedly and being forced by the EPA to clean up its water supply. Now if only we could disband that pesky EPA from keeping our water so clean and delicious. Ha Onto Toilet Paper Tax. Oh goody a 3 paragraph comment in a low key politics blog, how informal. I've taken the liberty to actually read the article the article posted within the blog you linked. Seems like an Oregon Rep made a tax proposal, it obviously is Obama's fault for Oregon being so liberal. Anyways the tax is used to offset costs in water treatment, particularly from paper in waste water. I really don't know much to say because the article in the blog provides no links to REAL news sources, it is just bashing the tax because it is a tax and is providing no pros or cons on the situation. Please use a news source next time and don't waste our time with forum and blog postings. Edited July 24, 2009 by Slavic Link to comment
Italian Jew Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 4473 Joined: 11/26/07 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 You honestly have no clue how a proper debate works. YOU provide hard evidence for your stance. and after reading WE provide our rebuttal with hard evidence of our own. Don't get into a pissy fit because you posted some jibberish that you want to tell us about and get pissed because your lazy ass didn't feel like supporting your own arguments. So lets get this rolling. Your "Fat Tax" as it is "quoted" in your "article" is "quoted" because it is not a "tax" after all but a new state program. The program is designed to cut down on obesity within the state government. Seeing how most state employees are over paid and given ridiculously good benefit programs compared to their quality of work; I'd be glad to see them get into shape so that they don't bleed the taxpayer provided medicare program with their 3rd heart surgery because they don't know how to say NO after the 5th Big Mac. Your second link of "hard evidence" comes from a 2 month old forum post who's only link on the subject was to Wikipedia... The article on Rainfall Tax, is about a town in Kentucky called Lexington. First of all I know what your saying, "If it can happen in Lexington, then by god it could happen ANYWHERE!", but don't worry there is good news. The tax was passed because Lexington has been fined repeatedly and being forced by the EPA to clean up its water supply. Now if only we could disband that pesky EPA from keeping our water so clean and delicious. Ha Onto Toilet Paper Tax. Oh goody a 3 paragraph in a low key politics blog, how informal. I've taken the liberty to actually read the article the article posted within the blog you linked. Seems like an Oregon Rep made a tax proposal, it obviously is Obama's fault for Oregon being so liberal. Anyways the tax is used to offset costs in water treatment, particularly from paper in waste water. I really don't know much to say because the article in the blog provides no links to REAL news sources, it is just bashing the tax because it is a tax and is providing no pros or cons on the situation. Please use a news source next time and don't waste our time with forum and blog postings. It's hard to piss off Slavic like this. I'll leave it at that. I would like to know if Runawayz actually thought of all of this or saw it on some blog/chain e-mail. Link to comment
roach coach Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 253 Joined: 03/11/09 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 It's hard to piss off Slavic like this. I'll leave it at that. I would like to know if Runawayz actually thought of all of this or saw it on some blog/chain e-mail. At least he posted it in the appropriate section Link to comment
Italian Jew Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 4473 Joined: 11/26/07 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 At least he posted it in the appropriate section Nah, should have posted in the Works in Progress section. Link to comment
Runski Posted July 24, 2009 Content Count: 604 Joined: 07/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted July 24, 2009 (edited) So end of discussion? If not, I would like to say this... Sorry for the picture being big. I really don't think we need a person who can't hold solid evidence posting links and shits in the polotics section, regarding Obama, besides, who says Fat Tax is a bad thing? It helps the Obese... learn to stop eating small children. Edited July 24, 2009 by Runski Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now