darth jacen Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 881 Joined: 08/10/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 i say let them keep it to them selves, if they continue to flaunt it then ban um Link to comment
matt 187 Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 2678 Joined: 08/07/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 For democracy. Link to comment
Lux Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 6712 Joined: 03/06/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 Another case solved by Lux and Cloud Link to comment
Hello Kitty :D! Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 352 Joined: 12/30/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 as far as i know Church was given a warning by raven maniac already, i don't see the point of this Link to comment
Caution Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 11501 Joined: 10/19/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 Honestly, a furry picture or sig once in awhile doesn't bother me. I don't agree with it, but I wouldn't bash somebody for it. It's when people post it EVERY DAY over and over is when it starts to piss me off. Should a total ban on anything furry related be added (EXCLUDING ANYTHING SEXUAL IN NATURE)? In my opinion, no. KennyG's avatar isn't the least bit offensive (IMO), and I don't think he should have to remove it. BUT, people like Church totally beat the furry thing into the ground and I feel what he does should not be tolerated. Link to comment
PotshotPolka Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 6084 Joined: 03/31/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 I had completely forgotten about Kenny's sig, lol. But there's a point to be made just in that. Link to comment
Tyler Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 1590 Joined: 06/06/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 I guess im against it, but as long as it not something you would see on a certain we/b/site it dosent bug me Link to comment
PotshotPolka Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 6084 Joined: 03/31/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 It's being taken of now. To make a point here for everyone, if I see anyone inciting him to flip out again I, and anyone else around here with an iota of integrity will be after you as well. Link to comment
SoulKeeper Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 2096 Joined: 07/05/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 Seriously, Church needs more than a warning. He constantly attacks, and I guarantee with a simple warning he'll try to get others banned now, rather than simply pissing people off. He does this constantly, and attacks anyone who doesn't embrace him or his furry attitude. Note: Hazard didn't say shit to him, we simply suggested his avatar is a branch of furry. 2 Link to comment
Kennith Posted August 19, 2009 Content Count: 2051 Joined: 05/10/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2009 With me around and giving the warnings, it won't happen again. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread