TheVirus Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 3391 Joined: 06/12/09 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 Admins should be chosen, not voted in. I could elaborate, but I really don't have the mental capacity at the moment to delve into such a subject. I am completely wasted. Link to comment
Lux Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 6712 Joined: 03/06/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 We usually don't vote the obvious idiots anyway. The old system doesn't really seem that much different except for the supporter part. Link to comment
Veggie Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 4123 Joined: 05/20/07 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 There are pros and cons to both systems, sure supporter is being used as a route to get admin but at the same time they are contributing to SG. The old system was not so great hence the need for the new one. Either way those who are power hungry and abuse their admin powers will get caught and sifted out eventually. Link to comment
SilentGuns Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 4799 Joined: 08/14/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 (edited) I agree. The only problem is that money counts and with that , nothing will change. Because of the supporters , almost any tard can become admin , giving me a reason to say '' WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU????'' every time I see a new admin. Not every supporter is like this , only the newer ones. Edited September 6, 2009 by SilentGuns Link to comment
Movement Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 1465 Joined: 07/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 Agree 100% Link to comment
zapper Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 1671 Joined: 07/18/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 i agree support :> Link to comment
Suffering Knave Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 349 Joined: 05/21/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 Perhaps not fully going back to the old system would be the right move. Like other people said, you will get a bad apple whichever way you do it. I think the new system is just too fast. I personally think the way you get supporter and how long you have to wait should be raised to a higher expectation. Instead of just two weeks before being able to apply, why not a month? The people who just wait two weeks then decide they want admin and no one knows who the heck they, is quite annoying to see. Worthless time spent by the higher-ups. Just raise the expectation not the whole way of getting admin. Link to comment
Trogdor Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 1752 Joined: 10/26/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 I'd support if it was seriously considered. They both have flaws but I liked how the old system was run, just my opinion. Link to comment
Spartan Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 4550 Joined: 06/05/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 (edited) All i see when i look at this thread is people who don't have the ability to vote on an admin application...wanting to be able to vote on it. Like you give a shit how many bad admins come through, or how much money we get from supporters. The good players will be good players and the bad players will be bad players. I don't see the big deal here. 1 Edited September 6, 2009 by Spartan Link to comment
Epic Bread Man Posted September 6, 2009 Content Count: 420 Joined: 11/16/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 6, 2009 I think that people that can control turtles with their minds should eat porridge and then get admins...but as for the supporters well I say sponsor a turtle for $5 a month and then you get frag grenades to eat and wash up in soap Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread