ReGIONALS Posted September 12, 2009 Content Count: 1844 Joined: 07/27/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 12, 2009 read up on it it looks like a great step up from the 4870x2 which is what ive got now and love it but my friend is gonna be building a computer around December/January so im gonna be selling my 4870x2 to him and use that money plus Christmas money to get a 58702gig. if i knew what the price on the new amd cpu id have that on my wish list Link to comment
trakaill Posted September 12, 2009 Content Count: 3736 Joined: 11/30/07 Status: Offline Share Posted September 12, 2009 Will they use a new port/motherboard??? Then maybe there is a reason to wait...if not then wtf are you on Link to comment
ReGIONALS Posted September 12, 2009 Content Count: 1844 Joined: 07/27/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 12, 2009 the new amd cpu uses am3 socket and the GPU is pretty much the same as before except is packed with awesome Link to comment
trakaill Posted September 12, 2009 Content Count: 3736 Joined: 11/30/07 Status: Offline Share Posted September 12, 2009 the new amd cpu uses am3 socket and the GPU is pretty much the same as before except is packed with awesome then you post about new cards and dx11 was irrelevant Link to comment
Akaru Posted September 13, 2009 Content Count: 1000 Joined: 06/12/09 Status: Offline Share Posted September 13, 2009 then you post about new cards and dx11 was irrelevant All he's been doing lately is spamming about the awe of the new ATI cards. They suck. I bet the GTX 285 can beat the upcoming HD 5870. Link to comment
Coffee Crisp Posted September 13, 2009 Content Count: 4960 Joined: 06/20/07 Status: Offline Share Posted September 13, 2009 (edited) All he's been doing lately is spamming about the awe of the new ATI cards. They suck. I bet the GTX 285 can beat the upcoming HD 5870. Well AMD just introduced a card that could run six 30" monitors single handily. But naturally I'm pretty sure NVIDIA has something up their sleeve... again. Edited September 13, 2009 by Coffee Crisp Link to comment
Shadowex3 Posted September 13, 2009 Content Count: 2959 Joined: 02/27/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 13, 2009 It's actually not that impressive from a technological standpoint. Link to comment
Akaru Posted September 13, 2009 Content Count: 1000 Joined: 06/12/09 Status: Offline Share Posted September 13, 2009 It's actually not that impressive from a technological standpoint. Exactly. What kind of gamer would even need 2 monitors, not to mention 6. It's just these useless features that ATI has to include to make up for the lack of raw graphics power. Link to comment
Wrathek Posted September 13, 2009 Content Count: 1839 Joined: 09/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 13, 2009 I'd say most gamers should have at least 2 monitors. then you can do other stuff easily on the other screen while playing games. and come on dude. i only use nvidia and im not gonna say something as asinine as what you just said. amd can make just about the exact same "raw graphics power", regardless of who makes the newest top of the line. Link to comment
Shadowex3 Posted September 13, 2009 Content Count: 2959 Joined: 02/27/08 Status: Offline Share Posted September 13, 2009 No, actually, you can't. Doing anything on the other monitor will cause the game to lose focus and minimize just like alt-tabbing would. I've got two monitors and while it's REALLY useful for windows so far with games it's only been useful for Supreme Commander. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now