Bubbles Posted December 16, 2009 Content Count: 2666 Joined: 08/21/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2009 yes you can slay them Link to comment
Exacto-Be Posted December 16, 2009 Content Count: 763 Joined: 10/17/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2009 (edited) Under your logic, if I go camp the left side of pool the whole round, I'm camping and should be slayed for it. Even though there is a deagle, a secret vent, AND a teleporter in there on razor. I'm camping the armory on freeday to protect the guns. Under your logic, slay. I'm camping... to protect... Under your logic, slay. ehm no cuz then u would prevent that terror get's guns ... & by doing that u are helping to guard the terrorists what is the objective ... but if the terrorists for example are in pool (i'm speaking bout map of alcatraz) u have nothing to search in sewer. because terrorist cannot acces sewer from pool ... they should first run out pool & past cells. if u camp to guard the terror ur doing gj ... this means in my opinion guarding places that are directly accesable from the place where the t's are ... + camping armory is fine too as far is i concern just to make clear, if u play in razor & ur camping on other side of map with awp but u have visual on the terror (or the door where terrors could get out) ur doing fine in my opnion the thing i dont like is when they do nothing that concerns the game & just go play solo & try & hide somewhere in the hope to survive for 5 minutes Edited December 16, 2009 by Exacto-Be Link to comment
tank40175 Posted December 16, 2009 Content Count: 665 Joined: 07/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2009 Under your logic, if I go camp the left side of pool the whole round, I'm camping and should be slayed for it. Even though there is a deagle, a secret vent, AND a teleporter in there on razor. I'm camping the armory on freeday to protect the guns. Under your logic, slay. I'm camping... to protect... Under your logic, slay. Did you even read the thread before trying to be a troll? In the examples you gave you are serving a purpose and helping your team. What was brought up in this thread is someone who is serving no purpose to thier team, and just holding up the round. In which case we should be able to slay. Link to comment
tank40175 Posted December 16, 2009 Content Count: 665 Joined: 07/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2009 http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=27680 Also this kinda leaves the whole debate open. In an admin complaint where the admins actions were deemed ok, as it was rejected. Link to comment
Italian Jew Posted December 16, 2009 Content Count: 4473 Joined: 11/26/07 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2009 http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=27680 Also this kinda leaves the whole debate open. In an admin complaint where the admins actions were deemed ok, as it was rejected. That complaint was incorrectly rejected and as you can tell, since it was Dracula, Garfield didn't give a shit. Can't rely on admin complaints or anything written down as it depends on what opinions of specific higher ups matter most as to the rule(s) at stake and who the punishment may be against. 2 Link to comment
Dracula Posted December 16, 2009 Content Count: 4685 Joined: 03/26/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2009 http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?p=275979#post275979 Link to comment
Awacs Posted December 16, 2009 Content Count: 589 Joined: 03/14/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2009 Did you even read the thread before trying to be a troll? In the examples you gave you are serving a purpose and helping your team. What was brought up in this thread is someone who is serving no purpose to thier team, and just holding up the round. In which case we should be able to slay. I'm not attempting to troll. I'm simply trying to make everyone see that camping is camping. Those that hate camping will call out camping even if done for a good reason. They don't like camping. Simple. If I'm going to guard a room on the side of the map opposite of the Terrorists, I'm still guarding something. So, I'm camping. So, I am helping the team by securing that room on the off chance of a rebellion that gets to me. Its hard as fuck to enforce, and open to so much interpretation it just gets fucking stupid. Get away from this slippery slope. I can almost guarantee admin and player complaints coming from camping and some admin's hate of camping should a rule be created. Its allowed plain and simple. You got warning shots. You've got enough. Link to comment
Caution Posted December 17, 2009 Content Count: 11501 Joined: 10/19/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 17, 2009 That complaint was incorrectly rejected and as you can tell, since it was Dracula, Garfield didn't give a shit. Can't rely on admin complaints or anything written down as it depends on what opinions of specific higher ups matter most as to the rule(s) at stake and who the punishment may be against. It's sad how true that is. Link to comment
Guest barackobama Posted December 17, 2009 Share Posted December 17, 2009 I can't wait till we get rid of the PB server, what a pain in the ass it is! Link to comment
Ngo Posted December 17, 2009 Content Count: 1053 Joined: 09/09/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 17, 2009 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now