Do you Agree with these rules 48 members have voted

[Mad Dogg]

i think these rules where just fine. u can kill prisoner whit unholstered gun.

these rules have been considered well. And jew is right about that think.

t´s should be killed whit primary even holstered.

[awesomebillfromdawsonvile]

i think these rules where just fine. u can kill prisoner whit unholstered gun.

these rules have been considered well. And jew is right about that think.

t´s should be killed whit primary even holstered.

 

then you voted no right? I see way to many yes votes for the no auto kill for primary rule being slipped in. thats a major change to pb.

[Mad Dogg]

then you voted no right? I see way to many yes votes for the no auto kill for primary rule being slipped in. thats a major change to pb.

 

no i votet yes

[awesomebillfromdawsonvile]

no i votet yes

 

well damit dogg, you should have voted no if you did not agree with that one rule. voting yes means you ok with the whole thing. Many times with these votes, no one seems to care what footliners you add to your vote, they only care how you vote. Right now the vote says 20-8 in favor of the rules posted. The vote says nothing about "yes but change that one rule" it says yes or no.

 

Not trying to be a dick mad dogg, I just dont want to see the auto kill for primary rule revoked, as it will be next to impossible to deal with.

[Karnivor]

 

Not trying to be a dick mad dogg, I just dont want to see the auto kill for primary rule revoked, as it will be next to impossible to deal with.

 

While it is difficult, it isn't game breaking, come out facing backwards, look away from CTs and take it out and drop it, then go back. That is all you have to order, if they disobey, then they are rebelling in a potentially harmful way and you get to shoot them.

[Hamster power]

i agree with these rules with the exception of one. i think if a t has a primary he should be killed regardless if it's holstered or not. i know accidental gun planting/picking up happens and the ct should be able to recognize whether or not he was rebellious or if it was an accident.

 

maybe that's just too wishful of thinking though.

[Karnivor]

i agree with these rules with the exception of one. i think if a t has a primary he should be killed regardless if it's holstered or not. i know accidental gun planting/picking up happens and the ct should be able to recognize whether or not he was rebellious or if it was an accident.

 

maybe that's just too wishful of thinking though.

 

Well to be honest, if they got it by rebelling, then you can kill them for rebelling, but I do know people have gone afk next to rebelling people and it has fallen on them. And if they don't have auto switch to most powerful weapon on then they have a chance to never know they have it.

[Mad Dogg]

well damit dogg, you should have voted no if you did not agree with that one rule. voting yes means you ok with the whole thing. Many times with these votes, no one seems to care what footliners you add to your vote, they only care how you vote. Right now the vote says 20-8 in favor of the rules posted. The vote says nothing about "yes but change that one rule" it says yes or no.

 

Not trying to be a dick mad dogg, I just dont want to see the auto kill for primary rule revoked, as it will be next to impossible to deal with.

 

i votet yes chose the rules where good not because that one rule.

[awesomebillfromdawsonvile]

While it is difficult, it isn't game breaking, come out facing backwards, look away from CTs and take it out and drop it, then go back. That is all you have to order, if they disobey, then they are rebelling in a potentially harmful way and you get to shoot them.

 

This is standard disarming procedure right here. The point is that in a split sec they can wheel around on you and start shooting. If it were a pistol, and he has guns drawn on him, he prlly wont kill anyone, but he will get off a few shots every time, should he choose to fire.

If this were a primary instead of a pistol, its way more likely that they will manage to take some one with them b4 they die, thus leading to 2 guns sitting out waiting for the ts to grab em.

 

Like i said it takes a fraction of a sec to wheel around and start spraying, and its much easier to get that lucky head shot with a fully automatic rifle. This rule WILL change the server if it goes through, and will make things alot easier on the ts.

 

also you had this to say,

Well to be honest, if they got it by rebelling, then you can kill them for rebelling, but I do know people have gone afk next to rebelling people and it has fallen on them. And if they don't have auto switch to most powerful weapon on then they have a chance to never know they have it.

__________________

 

Straight up, thats their problem. They change that option so they can be sneaky, not knowing that they are armed is the price they pay. Ive had ppl stand there and argue with me that they dont have a gun, and half the time when they do finally check they shoot me with it. Thats bullshit right there. If they cant take the time to know if they are armed or not, then they should not change this setting. Its way to much of a head ache to argue with some one about the gun they think they dont have.

 

i votet yes chose the rules where good not because that one rule.

 

Madd, that one rule changes the game. If you voted yes then you voted for it as well as all the other rules. If you dont agree with one of the rules you are supposed to vote no, and then give a reason why. You should have voted no, and then said "I voted no because i think most of the rules are good, but the primary one needs to change" or something along those line.

 

You see madd, I believe as you that most of the rules are good, but that one needs changed. If you want that one changed you have to vote it all down, or it will ride along with the rest of them and get passed.

[Nasu]

Cts should be able to kill for primary even if it's holstered. If every T has a prim holstered, the server will go to hell and CTs will start to camp.

 

Think razor with this..