Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Do you Agree with these rules  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you Agree with these rules


Prison Break 2010 Rules Discussion #3

Recommended Posts


  • Content Count:  444
  • Joined:  07/07/07
  • Status:  Offline

Cts should be able to kill for primary even if it's holstered. If every T has a prim holstered, the server will go to hell and CTs will start to camp.

 

Think razor with this..

 

Ha Ha! Did not even consider razor in this. I came out of the armory today and there were ts on all sides of me with automatic weapons. Enough primaries for all! Would be hell with out the auto kill for rifles rule.

Edited by awesomebillfromdawsonvile
Link to comment

  • Content Count:  8383
  • Joined:  12/17/08
  • Status:  Offline

If a CT can deny zombie freeday by not wanting to get left clicked, can the T also deny the zombie freeday? Since this rule is just to protect wussies I dont see why T's have to do zombie freeday if the CTs dont want to do it. To me its just a deathgame of who is gonna try it and get shot.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  701
  • Joined:  04/18/09
  • Status:  Offline

Like i said it takes a fraction of a sec to wheel around and start spraying, and its much easier to get that lucky head shot with a fully automatic rifle. This rule WILL change the server if it goes through, and will make things alot easier on the ts.

 

I will agree that is makes it easier on them, but if they are facing away from you, and you have your gun trained on their skull, they need to turn around and hopefully get a lucky shot before you pop their skull. I also suggest moving from where you were before they had to look away.

 

Eitherway, it needs to be an autokill.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  444
  • Joined:  07/07/07
  • Status:  Offline

another point, the only reason ts give up pistols is because they know they cant kill anyone with them once they have been found out. If they have a primary, they know they have a pretty decent chance of getting of a lethal shot, so they would and are way more likely to open fire.

 

Sometimes I like to try and warn armed ts that I take from behind, but they almost always try to open fire even when they really dont have a shot. Why? Because they know that primary is their best chance for win and giving it up can be like giving up your only chance for the round.

 

Point being, Ts are WAY more likely to give up a pistol as opposed to a primary rifle. The exception to this of course is ts who catch a dead ts gun by accident and instantly drop it so as not to be shot, but thats very different from someone going out of their way to pick up a primary.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  2043
  • Joined:  12/31/09
  • Status:  Offline

If a CT can deny zombie freeday by not wanting to get left clicked, can the T also deny the zombie freeday? Since this rule is just to protect wussies I dont see why T's have to do zombie freeday if the CTs dont want to do it. To me its just a deathgame of who is gonna try it and get shot.

 

zombie freeday=You have to shift walk. Nothing else on this server :(

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  701
  • Joined:  04/18/09
  • Status:  Offline

another point, the only reason ts give up pistols is because they know they cant kill anyone with them once they have been found out. If they have a primary, they know they have a pretty decent chance of getting of a lethal shot, so they would and are way more likely to open fire.

 

 

I agree with the primary part, but I generally manage to take one of you with me when my secondary is caught. :)

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  4473
  • Joined:  11/26/07
  • Status:  Offline

These rules are fine .

 

but I would prefer not to kill afks, as it is a strategy of rebellion.

 

Even if it is a strategy, the player would still have to abide by CT orders. If the order was to go to the pool and a T is in his cell, why shouldn't the CT be allowed to warn him and kill him? Ts still need to follow legitimate orders.

 

If you are a nice CT, you could leave them locked in their cell to see if they come back (if they are truly afk).

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  636
  • Joined:  01/02/09
  • Status:  Offline

Even if it is a strategy, the player would still have to abide by CT orders. If the order was to go to the pool and a T is in his cell, why shouldn't the CT be allowed to warn him and kill him? Ts still need to follow legitimate orders.

 

If you are a nice CT, you could leave them locked in their cell to see if they come back (if they are truly afk).

 

again, i said prefer.

 

i don't really mind killing afks but some people rebel with faking afk. (which i have stopped doing)

doesn't really matter to me anyways

 

these rules are fine and should be added asap :)

Edited by Cookie
Link to comment

  • Content Count:  444
  • Joined:  07/07/07
  • Status:  Offline

again, i said prefer.

 

i don't really mind killing afks but some people rebel with faking afk. (which i have stopped doing)

doesn't really matter to me anyways

 

these rules are fine and should be added asap :)

 

 

Anyone who is enough of a bitch, to just stand there in plain view and pretend to be afk should be shot dead. I for one always hide in my cell, I try to crouch in a corner and stay out of ct sight. But the moment Im discovered I always comply and never fake any afk bs. When they find me its pretty obvious that im not afk as Im usually crouching on the toilet in the back corner of the cell.

 

Pretending to be afk = cheating

Link to comment

Reply to Thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...