jeN Posted August 16, 2010 Content Count: 5086 Joined: 04/13/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2010 Good rules hope it will work! (only deathgames should be allowed i think but .. its a good start ) ba_underwater_prison_v4 Does not work for everyone. Saying it differs from maps. >!! i love the sounds of the new rules. makes more sense like being able to go rambo if you're the last CT. Far more realistic and fair. Not necessarily, you're only exempt from the warning shot rule, that's all. I was originally going to add death games as the biggest change, but after thinking about it I figured most people would just QQ. You can play death games with those who want though, that's always been the rule. Just lock the rest up somewhere and leave 'em. =P Sorry about that, it's removed now. Eh, the rule is a bit on the side of caution because I don't want everyone to just kill anyone they see, but things do get kind of hectic as the last CT alive when you're vs a numerous amount of T's. So any "freekillings" as the last CT are a bit different than a normal freekilling. I wouldn't slay the last CT alive for killing any of the T's he sees honestly. At this point, most T's are already rebelling or looking to rebel anyhow. Link to comment
Lordcrazy Posted August 16, 2010 Content Count: 975 Joined: 07/01/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2010 Thanks for adding more rules to T's with weapons, it makes the CT's job much easier and restricting catwalks. Link to comment
Third Posted August 16, 2010 Content Count: 813 Joined: 03/22/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2010 This actually makes PB sound worth playing :] Link to comment
Suzaku Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 221 Joined: 02/22/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 This actually makes PB sound worth playing :] Agreed, that and the removal of that razor v6 map. Link to comment
kool Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 429 Joined: 10/21/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 Eh, the rule is a bit on the side of caution because I don't want everyone to just kill anyone they see, but things do get kind of hectic as the last CT alive when you're vs a numerous amount of T's. So any "freekillings" as the last CT are a bit different than a normal freekilling. I wouldn't slay the last CT alive for killing any of the T's he sees honestly. At this point, most T's are already rebelling or looking to rebel anyhow. So a person listening to the rules is fine for being killed because the CT is the last one? Sorry, just want to clear this rule so I know how to enforce last CT. Link to comment
jeN Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 5086 Joined: 04/13/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 So a person listening to the rules is fine for being killed because the CT is the last one? Sorry, just want to clear this rule so I know how to enforce last CT. I'm not really sure there is a straight yes/no answer on this one simply because it depends on the map and everything else going on. For the most part though, I'd say yes it's fine. Examples: I'd say if CT is last alive and NUMEROUS T's are rebeling, then I wouldn't slay the CT. If last CT is alive and a bunch of T's are rebelling him, I'd also say that's fine to spray them as it's a bit hard to tell who actually has intent to rebel and who doesn't. If it's last CT, and say 1 T got into armory and that CT was camping elsewhere so started killing other non-rebelling T's then I'd be like "uhhh.. really?" Link to comment
kool Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 429 Joined: 10/21/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 I'm not really sure there is a straight yes/no answer on this one simply because it depends on the map and everything else going on. For the most part though, I'd say yes it's fine. Examples: I'd say if CT is last alive and NUMEROUS T's are rebeling, then I wouldn't slay the CT. If last CT is alive and a bunch of T's are rebelling him, I'd also say that's fine to spray them as it's a bit hard to tell who actually has intent to rebel and who doesn't. If it's last CT, and say 1 T got into armory and that CT was camping elsewhere so started killing other non-rebelling T's then I'd be like "uhhh.. really?" Well I mean, would you be fine with the last CT killing Ts that are in an area that they're allowed to be. For example, they have a freeday no past first cell. A few are rebelling as usual, but would you be fine if the last CT runs around and kills the ones that aren't rebelling, like just swimming in the pool or jumping on the big cage. Edit: I know what you mean about because he's the last CT and most Ts would be rebelling already, but there will be those ones that didn't do anything and just died because the last CT is paranoid. Link to comment
jeN Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 5086 Joined: 04/13/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 Well I mean, would you be fine with the last CT killing Ts that are in an area that they're allowed to be. For example, they have a freeday no past first cell. A few are rebelling as usual, but would you be fine if the last CT runs around and kills the ones that aren't rebelling, like just swimming in the pool or jumping on the big cage. Edit: I know what you mean about because he's the last CT and most Ts would be rebelling already, but there will be those ones that didn't do anything and just died because the last CT is paranoid. I think at that point its up to the admins discretion based on the circumstances ingame. If you feel the guy isn't trying to kill the rebelling T's and just any T, then if you feel fit to slay him go ahead. Just be prepared for QQ'ing because the rule was purposely left leaning a bit to both sides. If it's one round I'd just leave shrug it off, but if you notice the same CT doing it over and over again just say something about it. Link to comment
kool Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 429 Joined: 10/21/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 I think at that point its up to the admins discretion based on the circumstances ingame. If you feel the guy isn't trying to kill the rebelling T's and just any T, then if you feel fit to slay him go ahead. Just be prepared for QQ'ing because the rule was purposely left leaning a bit to both sides. If it's one round I'd just leave shrug it off, but if you notice the same CT doing it over and over again just say something about it. Expect a thread to be made about it soon, not from me, but from QQers about the last CT rule. Link to comment
Morningafter Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 678 Joined: 05/20/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 Well Kool a good way to look at that rule is just for a guideline........Shes not going to put that rule up than put example going "A. is ok B. is Ok C. is on occasion D. dont do E. up to admins"........its all of the moment and I think that rule should not be taken word by word...but as a guideline for new players. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now