jeN Posted August 17, 2010 Content Count: 5086 Joined: 04/13/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 17, 2010 I actually expressed myself badly, i didnt meant grab the gun, i jus meant that before they say no detour or delay it's quite logical if possible to bend your path toward a gun, and when they mention it you simply readjust your course. Thats the fun part about round beginning you can really bend your way around until you find an opportunity and it quite often ends up in hilarious outcomes. We lose a lot of this fun with the new no warning shot rules.. it becomes a generic Jail break server where CT become trigger happy and give ridiculous rules like.. dont touch this or dont do this and as soon as you do it even if its absolutly not a rebelling act.. Boom you're dead. Of course most of you will tell me "well dont do it and obey orders" sure i guess it makes sense if you wanna survive but what made PB fun was that on several maps it was quite hard to rebel as a T when faced to good Ct and it was also very hard for a CTS to keep T at bay. I've played a lot today and I have to say the amout of rebelling has really dropped, wich is a shame because it's what makes PB fun in the first place. Short intense rounds with CTs on their toes and T looking for every tiny opportunity. No detours and delays is not an implied rule, so if the CT's aren't saying it you're free to detour/delay a bit but you should eventually make it to the ordered area. If CT's are killing you without saying no detours and delays I would call that a freekill tbh. Link to comment
2rok Posted August 18, 2010 Content Count: 134 Joined: 04/16/10 Status: Offline Share Posted August 18, 2010 Start a demo up, if anything itll help the new rule process, more demos = more evidence = more insight = better server in the long run for your 15-20 minutes of 'work'. Give a little back to the servers, its not hard to make demos! bind / "record demotemp" bind . "stop" just remember to rename demotemp after you do it. Link to comment
jeN Posted August 18, 2010 Content Count: 5086 Joined: 04/13/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 18, 2010 (edited) nvm then Edited August 18, 2010 by jeN Link to comment
P3rg3 Posted August 18, 2010 Content Count: 1484 Joined: 06/18/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 18, 2010 About the restricted area, catwalks, since there seems to be some confusion. I mostly meant by adding this rule, catwalks that LEAD to a gun or area to get guns, armory. Not so much any catwalk or higher place/ledge. razor_v6 example here: the catwalk that leads to armory is a restricted area, but the catwalks on the prisoners cells is fine. Obviously my fault for the confusion and not really specifying it. I suppose if this is still an issue I could remove this rule but I mostly added it so CT's don't have to worry about calling "no catwalks" when trying to defend. No, don't change it. It's fine the way it is. Link to comment
Harry Posted August 18, 2010 Content Count: 2085 Joined: 04/19/10 Status: Offline Share Posted August 18, 2010 No, don't change it. It's fine the way it is. This. These new rules actually give me somewhat of a challenge as a T, or even a CT. It's a lot more enjoyable to play CT now than it was before. These rules are wonderful and I hope they stick around for longer than two weeks. The Ts I've seen are a lot hardened now, and are better players with the new non-pussy rules. Thanks a lot to jen and anyone else who put help into modifying the old rules. Link to comment
Im a Jackass Posted August 18, 2010 Content Count: 2105 Joined: 01/02/10 Status: Offline Share Posted August 18, 2010 GOD BLESS YOU JEN the only rule I dont care about is the warning shot one Link to comment
jeN Posted August 18, 2010 Content Count: 5086 Joined: 04/13/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 18, 2010 'k removed that part, hopefully i can play sometime before this ends to see how everything is going though. =p Link to comment
jeN Posted August 21, 2010 Content Count: 5086 Joined: 04/13/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 21, 2010 (edited) Double posting, GET @ ME Adding 2 new extensions to rules: 1. Warning shots, use common sense/judgment here. If a prisoner accidentally uncrouches or can't hear over the mic spam you cannot simply shoot them in the head. This does not mean, however, that warning shots are required when a terrorist is obviously disobeying orders. 2. If more than one order is given, CT's either must agree or they cannot freekill the T's for disobeying due to the confusion in the round and your own lack of preparation. Edited August 21, 2010 by jeN Link to comment
struki Posted August 21, 2010 Content Count: 1122 Joined: 10/31/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 21, 2010 //ba_jail_auschwitz_2 - WACIST! Needs to get removed I lol'd Link to comment
Focus_ Posted August 21, 2010 Content Count: 145 Joined: 04/16/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 21, 2010 Where is a thank you for me for posting all those maps! Thanks for adding those rules jenny! I hope it will work out. trololol And I love the new rules + revision. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now