Exacto-Be Posted August 19, 2010 Content Count: 763 Joined: 10/17/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 19, 2010 Yeah, and I'm not changing that. If I say 3 box rule, I mean 3 boxes away from the vent; if you're on the third box I'll still kill you. I agree with perge on this ... it's just to keep it simple ... just draw an imaginary line between third & fourth box ... don't cross that line ... but on the otherside if i'd see some1 sit on the back box i would just tell him to get off & perhaps warningshoot him ... not kill him since that'd be lame ... (ps, if he'd refuse to get of & start his explanation i would kill him afterall) Link to comment
trakaill Posted August 21, 2010 Content Count: 3736 Joined: 11/30/07 Status: Offline Share Posted August 21, 2010 Yeah, and I'm not changing that. If I say 3 box rule, I mean 3 boxes away from the vent; if you're on the third box I'll still kill you. ahahahhahahah... yeah.. I loled I read this after reading your comment in the other thread..makes sense now!! I agree with perge on this ... it's just to keep it simple ... just draw an imaginary line between third & fourth box ... don't cross that line ... but on the otherside if i'd see some1 sit on the back box i would just tell him to get off & perhaps warningshoot him ... not kill him since that'd be lame ... (ps, if he'd refuse to get of & start his explanation i would kill him afterall) dont mind him he is the kind of asshole that first of abused and then ruined PB! Link to comment
Exacto-Be Posted August 21, 2010 Content Count: 763 Joined: 10/17/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 21, 2010 I agree with perge on this ... it's just to keep it simple ... just draw an imaginary line between third & fourth box ... don't cross that line ... but on the otherside if i'd see some1 sit on the back box i would just tell him to get off & perhaps warningshoot him ... not kill him since that'd be lame ... (ps, if he'd refuse to get of & start his explanation i would kill him afterall) dont mind him he is the kind of asshole that first of abused and then ruined PB! Am i that him ? Link to comment
P3rg3 Posted August 21, 2010 Content Count: 1484 Joined: 06/18/08 Status: Offline Share Posted August 21, 2010 ahahahhahahah... yeah.. I loled I read this after reading your comment in the other thread..makes sense now!! dont mind him he is the kind of asshole that first of abused and then ruined PB! What are you talking about? Link to comment
FALbert Posted October 7, 2010 Content Count: 12 Joined: 08/20/10 Status: Offline Share Posted October 7, 2010 I honestly think that is a stupid rule why cant a CT go in the vents and watch to see if they are in the vents and what not. Link to comment
Veggie Posted October 7, 2010 Content Count: 4123 Joined: 05/20/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 7, 2010 I see your pretty new here, as a tip please only post to active threads, thank you mate Link to comment
Danno Posted October 7, 2010 Content Count: 1030 Joined: 05/09/10 Status: Offline Share Posted October 7, 2010 How about this? "No on boxes. No near two boxes by vent. Get along boxes. No knifing. No mousing. No flashlight. No spraying. Breathing could be a hazard, too. Im a dick as well. KTHXBAI". ...i think it could work! Link to comment
Caution Posted October 8, 2010 Content Count: 11501 Joined: 10/19/08 Status: Offline Share Posted October 8, 2010 I honestly think that is a stupid rule why cant a CT go in the vents and watch to see if they are in the vents and what not. I see your pretty new here, as a tip please only post to active threads, thank you mate Yeah, please read the date next time (top left corner of post). If it's about a week or so old, you should make sure that you're bumping it for a good reason. And for anyone who may be wondering... CT's must speak out what the 3 box rule is. Some players (surprisingly) don't know what the three box rule is. Also, saying "No jumping for the whole round" is ridiculous. It's fine if they say "Don't jump right now while we check guns" or something like that, for a few seconds. Other than that, 'No jumping' would not fall under a "reasonable rule" as in the MOTD. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread