How are the rules working out? 219 members have voted

[Lemonstein]

what else could be improved upon?

 

i guess another problem would be with the CTs giving the first order. They say it at the same time, or one says it first but nobody hears it. People often have to argue about what was the first order given

[jeN]

i guess another problem would be with the CTs giving the first order. They say it at the same time, or one says it first but nobody hears it. People often have to argue about what was the first order given

 

That isn't really something you can control with rules though =/

[Phonicz]

Its fine, i still hate it

[kabLe]

I personally do not like what the prison break server has become. No offense to Jen I know she's trying her best to suite everybody and mixing up. Warning shots do not have to be implemented imo. You should have a rule such as "Use Wise Judgement" Where if someone stands up for half a fucking second and you shoot him then its GTFO. That was obviously the wrong thing to do and you should go kill yourself. Another rule should be like "Listen to the Warden ONLY". In this, we should make it so that you only have to listen to one person to get all that retarded shit of 5 CT's telling you to do something. If the person is not the warden then don't listen to him. If you do you have the right to be killed. And if you give orders and you are not the warden and you kill someone, GTFO.

 

We should try to find a script that will randomly assign a player on the CT team to be Warden, it will say like "Gero is Warden, Nobody Else Has Right to Give Orders" In the rules you could put that CT's may offer their advice for rules such as saying like "Gero can we have th T's go to pool from big cage" Warden decides whether or not it should happen.

 

One last thing I would like to say, although its risky. The last 30 seconds of the round should be automatic freeday. In case you get the faggot Warden who says "Sit in Big Cage for 5 minutes while I go take a piss break." Last 30 seconds or so it don't fuckin matter what he says.

 

I think that the server would benefit but again its Jens decision. Although I wouldn't mind seeing a trial period for these rules seeing as how you're experimenting.

[jeN]

Hate the idea of a warden tbh.

 

What if we add something like this to the rules: Maybe better worded if someone can think of a better way though

 

 

1. Warning shots, use common sense/judgment here. If a prisoner accidentally uncrouches or can't hear over the mic spam you cannot simply shoot them in the head.
   
2. The user with a mic giving out orders is the priority order OVER text commands. If more than one order is given, CT's either must agree or they cannot freekill the T's for disobeying due to the confusion in the round and your own lack of preparation.
   

[Robfal]

Hate the idea of a warden tbh.

 

What if we add something like this to the rules: Maybe better worded if someone can think of a better way though

 

 

1. Warning shots, use common sense/judgment here. If a prisoner accidentally uncrouches or can't hear over the mic spam you cannot simply shoot them in the head.
   
2. The user with a mic giving out orders is the priority order. If more than one order is given, CT's either must agree or they cannot freekill the T's for disobeying due to the confusion in the round and your own lack of preparation.
   

 

Problem solved.

[Desum]

Hate the idea of a warden tbh.

 

What if we add something like this to the rules: Maybe better worded if someone can think of a better way though

 

 

1. Warning shots, use common sense/judgment here. If a prisoner accidentally uncrouches or can't hear over the mic spam you cannot simply shoot them in the head. This does not mean, however, that warning shots are required when a terrorist is obviously disobeying orders.
   
2. The user with a mic giving out orders is the priority order OVER text commands. If more than one order is given, CT's either must agree or they cannot freekill the T's for disobeying due to the confusion in the round and your own lack of preparation.
   

 

Added a simple sentence to prevent some QQ/complaints, since I know some douche will call that guideline out as a rule when they get killed for disobeying an order.

[kabLe]

I've talked with Jen and we thought of making a script that randomly assigns a person Warden for THE FIRST 2 MINUTES of the round so that the early round confusion can be taken care of. After 2 minutes it will say like "All CT's are now permitted to give orders" IMO cuts down on the early round confusion. After that you can't be retarded enough to fuck up, then again..

[Dezmonda]

Added a simple sentence to prevent some QQ/complaints, since I know some douche will call that guideline out as a rule when they get killed for disobeying an order.

 

that one sentence will definetly ease some of the headaches in PB

[Harry]

I've talked with Jen and we thought of making a script that randomly assigns a person Warden for THE FIRST 2 MINUTES of the round so that the early round confusion can be taken care of. After 2 minutes it will say like "All CT's are now permitted to give orders" IMO cuts down on the early round confusion. After that you can't be retarded enough to fuck up, then again..

No. CTs need to stop being trolls and decide which order they will follow. This works 99% of the time, unless (not saying names here) joins the server and intentionally gives orders other than what the other CTs agreed on, just to cause trouble.

 

The server is as near to PERFECT as it will ever be, right now. Please don't mess with it anymore . You've done a wonderful job.