Harry Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 2085 Joined: 04/19/10 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 To the above post some faceplam image here What don't you like about it? Instead of posting an image macro, you should say why you don't like it. That flash took me only a few minutes to make, and I would love constructive criticism rather than an image macro. Just posting an image macro instead of making a point is a pretty dumb move. In regards to said image macro, please help me understand it. I don't see two facepalms in it ("double facepalm" in the subtext). Is it a recursive image macro or something? As in, the facepalm is directed at the actual facepalm image? "Motivational images" are facepalm worthy, due to being so dumb. Or maybe the even worse Guy Fawkes mask? Or the site that is branded on the image? All of these statements make the image a complete waste of my bandwidth, looks dumb, and should be brought back to the crap board that is called /b/ (and stay there). If I wanted to see "LOL SO FUNNEE AND RANDUM xDDDD ANONIMUS WE R LEEJUN" image macros, I would be at that shitty board. This message is not meant to be rude to you, but only to inform you that I am frustrated that you wasted my time and bandwidth with the viewing of an image that has no redeeming qualities, nor any artistic value. Link to comment
Hellspawn Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 368 Joined: 12/07/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 What don't you like about it? Instead of posting an image macro, you should say why you don't like it. That flash took me only a few minutes to make, and I would love constructive criticism rather than an image macro. Just posting an image macro instead of making a point is a pretty dumb move. In regards to said image macro, please help me understand it. I don't see two facepalms in it ("double facepalm" in the subtext). Is it a recursive image macro or something? As in, the facepalm is directed at the actual facepalm image? "Motivational images" are facepalm worthy, due to being so dumb. Or maybe the even worse Guy Fawkes mask? Or the site that is branded on the image? All of these statements make the image a complete waste of my bandwidth, looks dumb, and should be brought back to the crap board that is called /b/ (and stay there). If I wanted to see "LOL SO FUNNEE AND RANDUM xDDDD ANONIMUS WE R LEEJUN" image macros, I would be at that shitty board. This message is not meant to be rude to you, but only to inform you that I am frustrated that you wasted my time and bandwidth with the viewing of an image that has no redeeming qualities, nor any artistic value. dude just laid the smack down lol I thought your flash thingy was funny if not headache inducing Link to comment
Kiwi Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 1324 Joined: 07/25/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 What don't you like about it? Instead of posting an image macro, you should say why you don't like it. That flash took me only a few minutes to make, and I would love constructive criticism rather than an image macro. Just posting an image macro instead of making a point is a pretty dumb move. In regards to said image macro, please help me understand it. I don't see two facepalms in it ("double facepalm" in the subtext). Is it a recursive image macro or something? As in, the facepalm is directed at the actual facepalm image? "Motivational images" are facepalm worthy, due to being so dumb. Or maybe the even worse Guy Fawkes mask? Or the site that is branded on the image? All of these statements make the image a complete waste of my bandwidth, looks dumb, and should be brought back to the crap board that is called /b/ (and stay there). If I wanted to see "LOL SO FUNNEE AND RANDUM xDDDD ANONIMUS WE R LEEJUN" image macros, I would be at that shitty board. This message is not meant to be rude to you, but only to inform you that I am frustrated that you wasted my time and bandwidth with the viewing of an image that has no redeeming qualities, nor any artistic value. Link to comment
MattShadows Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 561 Joined: 10/19/10 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 Link to comment
Spiritwind Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 1263 Joined: 02/07/10 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 lol, Hairy, its called a Gif/animation battle ;). No offense is suppose to be meant. Link to comment
TheVirus Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 3391 Joined: 06/12/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 And people wonder why others on the forum don't like them. Link to comment
Drox Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 8383 Joined: 12/17/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 This thread was kind of funny, now its just kind of sad. 1 Link to comment
Harry Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 2085 Joined: 04/19/10 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 lol, Hairy, its called a Gif/animation battle ;). No offense is suppose to be meant. Reverse trolling the trolls in this thread, so to speak. The only thing that I was serious about was the first sentence (though I do dislike image macros, not enough to complain about bandwidth; I have all the bandwidth in the world!). This thread was kind of funny, now its just kind of sad. I am good like that. Link to comment
ColdWar Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 283 Joined: 01/27/10 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 so its not snowing here in tx. someone make it snow pls Link to comment
matt Posted December 2, 2010 Content Count: 2947 Joined: 06/07/10 Status: Offline Share Posted December 2, 2010 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now