Suicide Posted March 29, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted March 29, 2011 Not many people from SG play 1.6 as far as I know, but getting the server isn't a bad idea. Link to comment
Jazz Posted March 29, 2011 Content Count: 4980 Joined: 06/20/08 Status: Offline Share Posted March 29, 2011 No, many people do have 1.6 and if they don't, it only costs like 10 bucks lol This will succed, I'm sure Link to comment
Suicide Posted March 29, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted March 29, 2011 Jazzman said: No, many people do have 1.6 and if they don't, it only costs like 10 bucks lol This will succed, I'm sure Meh, true. Link to comment
HZK Posted March 30, 2011 Content Count: 2553 Joined: 08/29/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 30, 2011 I'd rather we focus On CSS. 1.6 is a great game, don't get me wrong. It's just that I think we should continue to pay attention to the CS:S servers right now. But this would be a good future idea. Link to comment
Suicide Posted March 30, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted March 30, 2011 hunter/zombiephobia/knife said: I'd rather we focus On CSS. 1.6 is a great game, don't get me wrong. It's just that I think we should continue to pay attention to the CS:S servers right now. But this would be a good future idea. I hate to agree, but I do. Focusing where most players play is a lot better. Link to comment
2DG Posted March 30, 2011 Content Count: 1470 Joined: 10/13/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 30, 2011 Suicide said: I hate to agree, but I do. Focusing where most players play is a lot better. Even though theres more people playing cs 1.6 than css? If we stick to css we will just keep having the same people who just think, OH HEY, lets join another server of steamgamers. However if we get cs 1.6 servers we might actually get NEW players. Link to comment
Alucard Posted March 30, 2011 Content Count: 651 Joined: 05/19/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 30, 2011 Suicide said: I hate to agree, but I do. Focusing where most players play is a lot better. http://store.steampowered.com/stats/ oh look 1.6 is one of the most played :O!! Link to comment
HZK Posted March 31, 2011 Content Count: 2553 Joined: 08/29/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 31, 2011 Personally I meant we should build our current servers up more rather than get a mass of servers. Quality over Quantity. Link to comment
2DG Posted March 31, 2011 Content Count: 1470 Joined: 10/13/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 31, 2011 hunter/zombiephobia/knife said: Personally I meant we should build our current servers up more rather than get a mass of servers. Quality over Quantity. While, at first sight you might consider cs 1.6 as low quality, these are GREAT, alot of fun and they STAY fun. The servers can even be modified with certain items, zombie races etc. etc. Link to comment
Suicide Posted March 31, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted March 31, 2011 3DG said: Even though theres more people playing cs 1.6 than css? If we stick to css we will just keep having the same people who just think, OH HEY, lets join another server of steamgamers. However if we get cs 1.6 servers we might actually get NEW players. Well I like the idea of the server itself, but I said "at this moment" we should worry about CSS. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread