Huwajux Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 4198 Joined: 03/23/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 TBH I think its more of finding someone both trustworthy and that you guys like, they're plenty of people here trustworthy. You just don't like most of them so you don't take the time to actually find that they are in fact trustworthy (you meaning highers ups, not you andre). We don't take the time to find people who are trustworthy? Did you just completely ignore the fact that this thread is about the AOs having a lack of time? Link to comment
Zaraki Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 4960 Joined: 10/28/09 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 What? SA's make these choices in servers on a daily basis (Along with every other admin). How are CA's consider bigger dumbasses then SA's? lol Explain maybe, so I understand what you mean. Yeah sorry, i meant over player complaints on the forum. They need to decide the punishment for the player while ingame banning has rules and guidelines (you won't perm a guy for teamkilling if it's the first time... sort of speak). I'm sure there are SOME Ca's that can be trusted with these powers or responsibilities but i don't think Garfieldh is happy that everybody will be a higher up in a short amount of time because the work is too hard. I'm sure the Ao's and other higher ups will make up a way to fix the hard labour problem ;) Link to comment
duhoh Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 716 Joined: 01/16/10 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 They are busy but as you can see, ALL complaints are taken care of today. that's only cus our AM is a boss. much 사랑 여보 Link to comment
Ámber Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 664 Joined: 05/26/10 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 that's only cus our AM is a boss. much 사랑 여보 Ur right tho Link to comment
Drox Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 8383 Joined: 12/17/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 Yeah sorry, i meant over player complaints on the forum. They need to decide the punishment for the player while ingame banning has rules and guidelines (you won't perm a guy for teamkilling if it's the first time... sort of speak). I'm sure there are SOME Ca's that can be trusted with these powers or responsibilities but i don't think Garfieldh is happy that everybody will be a higher up in a short amount of time because the work is too hard. I'm sure the Ao's and other higher ups will make up a way to fix the hard labour problem ;) Only some CA's are trusted? Is this the Kremlin? lol Paranoid as hell with powers they already have, no one suggested giving anyone rcon access or forum admin. Link to comment
Zaraki Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 4960 Joined: 10/28/09 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 Only some CA's are trusted? Is this the Kremlin? lol Paranoid as hell with powers they already have, no one suggested giving anyone rcon access or forum admin. Aight i know that, but there has been talked about in this thread that Ca's could be taking care of player complaints. Then they would either have the power to ban them theirselves or there is no purpose in that because they would still need an AO to get the banned in the end. Double work for the same result. Link to comment
Ámber Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 664 Joined: 05/26/10 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 Only some CA's are trusted? Is this the Kremlin? lol Paranoid as hell with powers they already have, no one suggested giving anyone rcon access or forum admin. Well they wern't CA's if they were not trustfull >. Link to comment
Dracula Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 4685 Joined: 03/26/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 No, we don't trust 100+ people with Rcon, forum mod, and control panel access. Does it truly matter, seems it takes much less to do the same ammount of damage. Link to comment
Drox Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 8383 Joined: 12/17/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 Aight i know that, but there has been talked about in this thread that Ca's could be taking care of player complaints. Then they would either have the power to ban them theirselves or there is no purpose in that because they would still need an AO to get the banned in the end. Double work for the same result. lol What? Im not sure you understood what I meant by it, so nevermind. ;) Link to comment
Spiffy Posted February 1, 2011 Content Count: 984 Joined: 08/20/09 Status: Offline Share Posted February 1, 2011 Aight i know that, but there has been talked about in this thread that Ca's could be taking care of player complaints. Then they would either have the power to ban them theirselves or there is no purpose in that because they would still need an AO to get the banned in the end. Double work for the same result. What are you trying to get at? We do have the power to ban them ourselves. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now