Guest barackobama Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 This isnt drama. This is an in-depth discussion about the future of SG. I won't stop giving my input and end the discussion, so if you want to censor my opinion, you can ban me. The point is that indeed Garfield is the owner of SG on paper, but him cashing in on the hard work of others is despicable. I understand why you want to keep things quiet until you're legally the owner, since we cant Do shit about anything after that day. Cashing in on the hard work? I haven't cashed in on anything, I've lost money from selling SteamGamers. What about my hard work? I force no one to volunteer the time for this community. Link to comment
Suicide Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 This isnt drama. This is an in-depth discussion about the future of SG. I won't stop giving my input and end the discussion, so if you want to censor my opinion, you can ban me. I agree with the drama part, this stuff pretty much comes from people caring about SG and not wanting it to fall in the dust. I'm pretty sure we can give the guy a chance, and Amit, you'll be liked soon, people just weren't expecting it and they feel like SG is just something to toss around for money, which it isn't. Link to comment
Guest barackobama Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 I agree with this, this stuff pretty much comes from people caring about SG and not wanting it to fall in the dust. I'm pretty sure we can give the guy a chance, and Amit, you'll be liked soon, people just weren't expecting it and they feel like SG is just something to toss around for money, which it isn't. So it was fine for Haggard to toss it round for money? I've tossed around enough of my money for SG, you were not complaining then.... Link to comment
Amit Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 488 Joined: 02/06/11 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 (edited) This isnt drama. This is an in-depth discussion about the future of SG. I won't stop giving my input and end the discussion, so if you want to censor my opinion, you can ban me. The point is that indeed Garfield is the owner of SG on paper, but him cashing in on the hard work of others is despicable. I understand why you want to keep things quiet until you're legally the owner, since we cant Do shit about anything after that day. Go ahead.....voice your opinion. No one has ever tried to censor your posts ? I did not 'kept quiet' ... I was pretty vocal abt my feelings as well. EDIT: I've taken your suggestion and will keep quiet until I take over. :-) Edited February 24, 2011 by Amit Link to comment
Suicide Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 So it was fine for Haggard to toss it round for money? I've tossed around enough of my money for SG, you were not complaining then.... I'm not saying that, and I'm not saying your work isn't appriciated here either. I'm just saying people here aren't going to adapt that quick to the changes and that's why they're downing Amit before they can even see what he can do. Link to comment
Suicide Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 Also, I feel I should mention that I only agree with Saxe on the 'drama' part of his posts, nothing else. Link to comment
Guest barackobama Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 I'm not saying that, and I'm not saying your work isn't appriciated here either. I'm just saying people here aren't going to adapt that quick to the changes and that's why they're downing Amit before they can even see what he can do. I or Amit didn't expect anyone to adapt overnight. Link to comment
Ámber Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 664 Joined: 05/26/10 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 Nah, I think we're done with the drama...... Then you dont know this community, since this wasnt drama.. This will never end.. Remember drama is everywhere now its about this.. Tomorrow we got drama becuz we dont like our sandwich Link to comment
Suicide Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 I or Amit didn't expect anyone to adapt overnight. Personally, I adapt to things fast, but I'm glad that you had already thought about it for months before going along with the decision, cause that means that you mean well for the community. Even tho I didn't know you that well, the part I did see you do was outstanding here, and I think Amit can do the same. Anyway, just incase I never get to say it in the later future, thanks for everything you did here Garfield, won't be forgotten. Link to comment
Saxe Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1158 Joined: 12/23/07 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 Go ahead.....voice your opinion. No one has ever tried to censor your posts ? I've already stated my opinion about this. So, please end this discussion right now. The site belongs to GF as of now.... ?! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread