MPQC Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 2167 Joined: 03/24/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 I'd like to see a clear reason of why them taking over is a bad thing. (Besides "they bought us wah wah wah"). 6 Link to comment
Kamakazii101 Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 316 Joined: 05/02/09 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 Everyone just needs to chill Go back to smoking pot or eating mum's meatloaf in her basement or something. We have more important things in life to attend to than sitting around complaining about the new man in town. Who knows, this breath of fresh air will probably help our community grow and branch out. We just gotta see where it goes...if not then fine start your revolution braveheart. Link to comment
ScubaToaster Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 2075 Joined: 02/08/10 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 I think that Amit as many options to offer the community and he's gone out of his way to answer every question throw at him as well as being upfront with his intentions and plans. I also feel that he might do a better job than Garf, though I enjoyed my time here with him as PO. I hope to enjoy many great times with Amit as PO and Charles as a BD, that's my 2 cents there. As far as my reaction of it being "given out of hands" I'm content, Amit seems to be the sort to help communities and nuture them. You wouldn't answer all thier answers and share plans if he wasn't going to stick around and help instead of farming money off of it. SO 1 Link to comment
Hazardous Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 2132 Joined: 06/30/07 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 My only concern is that he used 'infact' in place of 'in fact'. abt 1 Link to comment
James Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 2645 Joined: 06/05/07 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 You realise Garfield isn't stepping down until the 15th, right? I understand that Amit and Charles are already on the forums and everything, but this poll is difficult to vote on, simply because ownership hasn't been transferred yet. Regardless, I will support both of them, since this is for SG's future 1 Link to comment
ReGIONALS Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1844 Joined: 07/27/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 SG has been going downhill for a while, hopefully amit can expand the community and listen to what members want. 1 Link to comment
CrystalSeeker Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 88 Joined: 02/02/11 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 i haven't really been there long enough to really give a shit about any of this, in all honesty. And as far as i know, its only a change in ownership, nothing to rant about, unless the new owner just happens to be hitler. 1 Link to comment
matt Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 2947 Joined: 06/07/10 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 Yes Amit and Charles seem very keen and willing do to a good job so I hope they will do there best to keep Sexy Gamers happy 1 Link to comment
Chainedlord Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1278 Joined: 05/30/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 In my honest opinion I was extremely mad at first but now I support Amit and Charles. 1 Link to comment
Troy Posted February 24, 2011 Content Count: 1554 Joined: 08/04/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 24, 2011 (edited) Looks like Garfield made the right decision with who to give it to, and probaly a good one with looking at amit, his experience, and what he has posted so far about how he plans to help SG 1 Edited February 24, 2011 by Troy Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread