Daze Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 6741 Joined: 06/10/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 Ty. And Congrats Chained and James! Not forgetting Megan, of course Congrats all. Link to comment
Jaffa Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 4263 Joined: 09/18/07 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 If SAs get voted for by members, I would prefer it to be heavily moderated, and possibly preferably private except to higher ranks (voting, and reasoning), to prevent disruption, and people reasoning their votes by saying "i agree because what others have said" Link to comment
b0red Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 4360 Joined: 04/25/09 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 what shall become of me! Link to comment
*Queen VenomousFate* Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 2306 Joined: 02/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 (edited) Essentially...yes. Also..before anyone asks me abt the veteran members - A 'veteran' member is one who has served SG and helped it grow to where it is today. This is a prestigious group of members that truly represent SG. So, postcount whores and inactive pilot members are not part of the group. Do Veteran Members get anything special? Or just the Usergroup? And what will prevent the group from becoming another Community Advisor Group? The CA group started out small with just a handful of our most veteran members, but it very quickly exploded into the large group it is today with some CAs getting the rank after only a few weeks here at SG. I would also like to point out that SteamGamers is now a Plutarchy. i.e the combination of a Plutocracy and an Oligarchy. Edited February 27, 2011 by *Queen VenomousFate* Link to comment
Tyler Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 1590 Joined: 06/06/09 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 I think BDs should pick who gets admin, most people would just pick someone to be admin because they're friends and not about who would be the better choice. 1 Link to comment
Coffee Crisp Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 4960 Joined: 06/20/07 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 congrats! Link to comment
Bullet Wound Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 2390 Joined: 09/24/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 BDs (and in some cases AOs) can nominate members for the rank of SA. But, it will have to go through a public vote .. and would need atleast 60% votes in favor. Can we up that to around 80-90%? 60% just seems so low.... Also what are the restrictions on who can vote for them. Do Veteran Members get anything special? Or just the Usergroup? ^This, is it just a recognition rank or will they actually serve a greater purpose. Link to comment
Huwajux Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 4198 Joined: 03/23/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 Can we up that to around 80-90%? 60% just seems so low.... Also what are the restrictions on who can vote for them. This, 60% yes votes is just barely breaking even and should be bumped up further if you really plan on making admin selection less popularity-based. I think BDs should pick who gets admin, most people would just pick someone to be admin because they're friends and not about who would be the better choice. Also this, except that we need to modify Potshot's system with the new rankings so that we get as broad an overview of applicants as possible. Link to comment
hackerz Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 148 Joined: 03/24/07 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 congrats to all! Link to comment
Tweezy Posted February 27, 2011 Content Count: 3791 Joined: 08/08/09 Status: Offline Share Posted February 27, 2011 Congratulations everyone! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now