Guest BoM Posted March 23, 2011 Share Posted March 23, 2011 What Zealot said, lol i think that population drop is a load of crap. Maybe its because admins stopped going in there, and then the server started going down. Sooo ya.....but like Zealot said it was just something fun to do, cool to see who does what est.... Link to comment
APenguin Posted March 23, 2011 Content Count: 539 Joined: 06/07/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 23, 2011 I honestly like ranks in PB, but thats cause i dont worship the rank system, i just like being able to see where i rank.. Link to comment
Suicide Posted March 24, 2011 Content Count: 1249 Joined: 01/15/11 Status: Offline Share Posted March 24, 2011 Pretty sure this won't happen as much as some of us want it too. I say we don't do it btw. Link to comment
Barber Posted March 24, 2011 Content Count: 1058 Joined: 02/23/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 24, 2011 Last time ranks were implented in PB, it was cool for the first week or so. Then it became Nazi CTs and pussy Ts fearing death. Link to comment
themuffinman Posted March 24, 2011 Content Count: 421 Joined: 03/04/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 24, 2011 you guys might as well give up on this its not going back into the server we had it in the past and all it caused were problems with ct's Link to comment
Joey_Stalin Posted March 24, 2011 Content Count: 66 Joined: 05/30/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 24, 2011 After reading through all three pages the general consensus that I can see is that we don't want ranks based on how CT's could act...Well why don't we just rank based on T teams? I'm not sure if it's possible or not, but it would be a great way to rank the effectiveness of rebellers. Another thing, everyone seems to not like Nazi CTs. IMO, it's exactly what we need. The past couple months I've been active EVERYDAY, but the last few days I've dropped off because of the useless CTs. If I wanted a freeday every round, I'd just play on a LAN server by myself. Freedays are out of control, they're given every other round for no reason. To my recollection, freedays were once in a million a couple years ago. Getting a freeday was THE SHIT. And my last point from my long and drawn out conclusion, PB isn't effected by having ranks or not having ranks. I think the general idea of CS:S is that it's just fucking CS:S. No one REALLY cares about their rank enough to freekill to the top or to camp to preserve an already sterling performance. In the end, T's win 90% of the time. Put ranks back in, who gives a shit who does what. If they break rules, just bring in admins like we do now. It's not going to change anything, it's just another useless command we can use. Link to comment
Toyz Posted March 25, 2011 Content Count: 346 Joined: 01/16/11 Status: Offline Share Posted March 25, 2011 I'd say we should have a "whitelist" for CTs. 1 Link to comment
themuffinman Posted March 26, 2011 Content Count: 421 Joined: 03/04/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 26, 2011 After reading through all three pages the general consensus that I can see is that we don't want ranks based on how CT's could act...Well why don't we just rank based on T teams? I'm not sure if it's possible or not, but it would be a great way to rank the effectiveness of rebellers. Another thing, everyone seems to not like Nazi CTs. IMO, it's exactly what we need. The past couple months I've been active EVERYDAY, but the last few days I've dropped off because of the useless CTs. If I wanted a freeday every round, I'd just play on a LAN server by myself. Freedays are out of control, they're given every other round for no reason. To my recollection, freedays were once in a million a couple years ago. Getting a freeday was THE SHIT. And my last point from my long and drawn out conclusion, PB isn't effected by having ranks or not having ranks. I think the general idea of CS:S is that it's just fucking CS:S. No one REALLY cares about their rank enough to freekill to the top or to camp to preserve an already sterling performance. In the end, T's win 90% of the time. Put ranks back in, who gives a shit who does what. If they break rules, just bring in admins like we do now. It's not going to change anything, it's just another useless command we can use. having T based ranks would be great IMO, it would cause more t's to rebel to get their rank up but what i think would be great, is to base ct ranks on how many rounds ct's win and rounds that t's dont win i have to agree with you somewhat on having nazi ct's because the nazi ct's actually watch the prisoners and give them constant orders most ct's now are just lazy and send you to pool or big cage for the entire round on last thing, rank Does in fact effect PB both in a pos. and neg. way causes t's to rebel more and ct's to freekill/camp more Link to comment
HZK Posted March 26, 2011 Content Count: 2553 Joined: 08/29/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 26, 2011 I found the missing part of the law: ct's + rank = nazi hunters T's + rank = paranoid bitches Link to comment
Testudo Posted March 28, 2011 Content Count: 851 Joined: 07/02/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 28, 2011 this is a horrible idea. end of story. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now