Revy Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 7 Joined: 06/03/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 There are many players who constantly tell the CTs whenever one of their teammates has a gun, or where they are if they try to sneak off, or if they went in a vent, and so on - anything they can to prevent a successful rebellion. This is a team game, I do not feel it is conducive to good gameplay to allow terrorists to intentionally make their team lose every round. If they want to help the CTs win they should have to play as CT instead of ruining the experience for their teammates. Link to comment
Neptune Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 1513 Joined: 10/03/11 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 Well its usually frowned upon by the T team and its a little silly to make a rule. 2 Link to comment
Revy Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 7 Joined: 06/03/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 Being "frowned upon" doesn't do anything. There are people who play on this server who never rebel and have the only goal of helping the CTs in any way they can. They are going out of their way to ruin the game for their teammates. How is that justifiable? They're effectively teamkilling, but they aren't held responsible for it at all. Link to comment
Lupin Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 1086 Joined: 07/28/12 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 I do it some times, and i find it funny. I mean if your teammate has a primary out and you say "Oh x has a primary" the CT won't check every T slowly with an awp to find the name. They're gonna shoot the guy shooting with the awp. And if it's a secondary guy is just gonna have to think fast. I really don't see this happening that much on PB. Like once or twice every couple of maps Link to comment
Kippe Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 1109 Joined: 04/30/12 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 It's roleplay. There should be snitches every once and awhile. Link to comment
Revy Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 7 Joined: 06/03/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 Teamkilling might be funny to the person doing it, but it isn't funny to the person on the receiving end. It's great that you think teamkilling is funny, but there's a reason intentional teamkilling is banned on every server. This is just an extension of teamkilling suited to this specific game mode. Link to comment
Mad Dogg Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 2844 Joined: 10/28/09 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 Being "frowned upon" doesn't do anything. There are people who play on this server who never rebel and have the only goal of helping the CTs in any way they can. They are going out of their way to ruin the game for their teammates. How is that justifiable? They're effectively teamkilling, but they aren't held responsible for it at all. Teamkilling is and will always be against the rules. If someone does teamkill you on purpose feel free to contact me or any other of our admins or record it and make a player complaint. But also keep in mind that accidents do happen sometimes. Link to comment
Revy Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 7 Joined: 06/03/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 My point is that "snitching" isn't counted as teamkilling, even when it directly is. If someone says I just went in a vent, and I directly die because of it, my teammate has effectively killed me, but somehow isn't responsible for it. I could have won the game for my team and instead I've been screwed over by someone who goes out of his way to do this every round. It's obnoxious, and it shouldn't happen every map, or at all. Link to comment
Lupin Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 1086 Joined: 07/28/12 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 Teamkilling might be funny to the person doing it, but it isn't funny to the person on the receiving end. It's great that you think teamkilling is funny, but there's a reason intentional teamkilling is banned on every server. This is just an extension of teamkilling suited to this specific game mode. Playing hound dog does not equal team killing. Team killing is when your teammate does an action that directly leads to you dying. Me telling the CTS that X has a gun doesn't automatically lead to X dying, there's a procedure if Ts have a secondary gun. My point is that "snitching" isn't counted as teamkilling, even when it directly is. If someone says I just went in a vent, and I directly die because of it, my teammate has effectively killed me, but somehow isn't responsible for it. I could have won the game for my team and instead I've been screwed over by someone who goes out of his way to do this every round. It's obnoxious, and it shouldn't happen every map, or at all. If a T tells the CT where you are while dead then that's considered ghosting. But if they aren't then it's fun. I'd assume he T was dead cause you said it makes you lose the round. But idk Link to comment
Revy Posted June 6, 2013 Content Count: 7 Joined: 06/03/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 6, 2013 (edited) Snitching on guns is annoying, but it isn't my main concern. It's more about snitching on your location when you sneak off, which is when you're kill on sight. When the CTs would otherwise have no idea that you're out of their grasp and going for a weapon, and your teammate snitches on you, that action that your teammate took directly results in you dying, which is, as you say, teamkilling. But if they aren't then it's fun. HOW? How is it fun for my teammate to take an action that directly results in me dying when I'm trying to do the objective? It doesn't matter if it's fun for the teamkiller. That's not how rules are made. It's "fun" to freekill, it's "fun" to teamkill, it's "fun" to do things to other people that negatively impact their experience but not yours. Edited June 6, 2013 by Revy Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread