Maniac Posted May 14, 2015 Content Count: 3299 Joined: 04/08/09 Status: Offline Share Posted May 14, 2015 Update Link to comment
Console Posted May 14, 2015 Content Count: 588 Joined: 03/12/15 Status: Offline Share Posted May 14, 2015 Update. Nova 2 now Link to comment
Jazz Posted May 14, 2015 Content Count: 4980 Joined: 06/20/08 Status: Offline Share Posted May 14, 2015 Sorry but this wont work, you will definitely need at least 1 sub due to the fact that we have people who don't live in the same timezones and can't play at the same times. Yeah I assumed we would have like 8-9 additional ppl signing up for this so we would have subs aswell. But I may be wrong l33t drawing there by the way xddd Link to comment
Zorg Posted May 14, 2015 Content Count: 640 Joined: 04/15/14 Status: Offline Share Posted May 14, 2015 Update I am MG2 Naow Link to comment
SpikedRocker Posted May 15, 2015 Content Count: 6242 Joined: 04/13/08 Status: Offline Share Posted May 15, 2015 (edited) Just an update on what we are thinking on teams, we are definitely wanting to have teams to have extra subs. Honestly, we are anticipating people dropping out once teams are decided. We are also thinking of a way to have extras floating around in some way to help fill in emergency situations. Edited May 15, 2015 by BoM Link to comment
Spr00k Posted May 15, 2015 Content Count: 352 Joined: 08/28/12 Status: Offline Share Posted May 15, 2015 mge now ayye Link to comment
Rilex Posted May 15, 2015 Content Count: 501 Joined: 08/04/13 Status: Offline Share Posted May 15, 2015 I'm open to being a sub/extra if need be. Was Nova 1 but got deranked to SEM and stripped of a couple wins. haven't played comp in a week or two, but it should n't take long to get rank back. Link to comment
Wawa Posted May 15, 2015 Content Count: 3740 Joined: 05/21/12 Status: Offline Share Posted May 15, 2015 I would recommend splitting teams to have at least 7 on each roster. Worse comes to worse, a team that turns out to have more than 2 inactives can always trade with a team that just so happens to have all 7 players active. Link to comment
Neptune Posted May 15, 2015 Content Count: 1513 Joined: 10/03/11 Status: Offline Share Posted May 15, 2015 (edited) I would recommend splitting teams to have at least 7 on each roster. Worse comes to worse, a team that turns out to have more than 2 inactives can always trade with a team that just so happens to have all 7 players active. We did this in the 3v3, 2 subs to give some leeway. Plus they won't really be subs it will just be the captain picking whos playing or if someone can't the others play. Also we need some clear cut rules about this tourney. The 3v3 was very flexible and allowed for some stupid stuff. AKA my 2 team members leaving and me rebuilding my team mid tourney. (I still don't forgive you @BoM and @jeN, even though I won) Edited May 15, 2015 by Neptune Link to comment
BoM Posted May 15, 2015 Content Count: 3150 Joined: 02/28/10 Status: Offline Share Posted May 15, 2015 (edited) We did this in the 3v3, 2 subs to give some leeway. Plus they won't really be subs it will just be the captain picking whos playing or if someone can't the others play. Also we need some clear cut rules about this tourney. The 3v3 was very flexible and allowed for some stupid stuff. AKA my 2 team members leaving and me rebuilding my team mid tourney. (I still don't forgive you @BoM and @jeN, even though I won) Go fuck yourself kid. That tourney was Shit and we didn't wanna play anymore. You can't stop people from leaving so good luck. @Neptune There were much stupider things that were allowed to happen in that tournament, ultimately why we left. Edited May 15, 2015 by BoM Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now