Jump to content

? servers

? players online

New Rule ?

Recommended Posts


  • Content Count:  3287
  • Joined:  01/06/14
  • Status:  Offline

Might it be an idea to add the following rule, or something like it;

" The CT initiating a death game is the designated shooter."

 

basically meaning that the CT starting the death game with a group of Ts is the one who calls the shots about who lives and dies, and other CTs cannot shoot them.

 

Quite often I want to play a death game with some T's and then a random CT pops one in the head for assuming that guy lost, yet most of the time those CTs did not hear the rules properly, or falsely shoot the T =/

  • Like 1
Link to comment

  • Content Count:  8383
  • Joined:  12/17/08
  • Status:  Offline

That would make a lot of sense. One time I watched a deathgame where it was a race and CT's ended up killing two T's before the race was even finished just because one guy was a little more ahead than the others even though they still had a chance to bypass him to take the lead. The CT that was seemly in charge of the deathgame was confused but in the end just went with it. Maybe it can cut down on dumb stuff like that.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  3462
  • Joined:  04/07/13
  • Status:  Offline

It sounds like it should be implied anyways, the only reason someone else should be shooting the death game players is if they end up rebelling and the lead CT can't handle it. Those CTs should be watching the Ts not playing the deathgame. I feel like this can be more of an unwritten rule.

 

Another CA(s)/AO opinion would seem legit though.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  1513
  • Joined:  10/03/11
  • Status:  Offline

It would be too annoying to enforce IMO because usually people aren't getting it wrong when they kill that one T, and if they do then you can just slay them.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  2954
  • Joined:  08/25/12
  • Status:  Offline

I don't feel like this should be a new rule, mainly because the situation you presented would just fall under "freekilling" and the person should be punish accordingly.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  528
  • Joined:  01/16/12
  • Status:  Offline

If another CT kills somebody for the wrong reason then it's a freekill which is already a rule... The scenario you said in your post is just a freekill and doesn't sound like it needs another full rule.

Link to comment

Reply to Thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...