DarkJesture Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 165 Joined: 01/02/11 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 Hey there, I thought this was the right place for this suggestion, but I am special at times so I might be wrong.... I've noticed the lack of sv_airaccelerate on the PB server, and I believe it should be raised to 150. The main reason being that I want to be able to bhop and own the cts, but also because a lot of maps have a bhop section that is nearly impossible with the current setting. What are other people's opinion on this? Could/should we add this? Link to comment
Black Rain Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 6759 Joined: 06/23/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) Don't mean to be rude but I have to disagree. It won't be fair to CTs at all. It's already REALLY easy to rebel as a T, even when CTs have been given full body armor. The ability for us to bhop just makes it 100x worse to be a CT because it'll be harder to control Ts imo. It would make rebeling as a T pretty much a piece of cake and I feel like it'll make jailbreak less fun for those who always like to go CT. I've seen many times where people who go CT get upset that Ts are able to win rounds so often that they frustratingly go switch to T since they're tired of losing so quickly. I'm imagining that with an increase for in air_accelerate and people going nuts in bhopping. Edited June 27, 2015 by Black Rain Link to comment
BoM Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 3150 Joined: 02/28/10 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 no bhop spam. ever 1 Link to comment
nick Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 2983 Joined: 01/08/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 bhop should be for mg and mg only 1 Link to comment
Nuclear Onion Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 3462 Joined: 04/07/13 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 What the three above me said, the cts already have enough problems as it is. No need to add bunnys in the mix... Link to comment
DarkJesture Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 165 Joined: 01/02/11 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 I understand your point of view, I'm just a bhop whore Link to comment
Mudkip™ Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 528 Joined: 01/16/12 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 bhopping is for source, and source is dead. bhopping should be too. Link to comment
Darnias Posted June 27, 2015 Content Count: 916 Joined: 11/19/12 Status: Offline Share Posted June 27, 2015 bhopping is for source' date=' and source is dead. bhopping should be too.[/quote'] Can we ban this fag? 1 Link to comment
Maxwelldon Posted June 28, 2015 Content Count: 1730 Joined: 02/15/08 Status: Offline Share Posted June 28, 2015 bhopping is for source' date=' and source is dead. bhopping should be too.[/quote'] Bhop shall not die. I personally like to Bhop and it's good way to spend time when you really don't have much else to do. Can we ban this fag? ^ gief @Mudkip™ a chance, lol ~ swinging ban hamma isn't always the first answer I don't really see this being a good thing for PB like others have said, it would just make it more hard for CT's to control the prisoners since it would really throw off the balance between those who can do it and who can not. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now