Goku Posted August 27, 2016 Content Count: 2589 Joined: 02/05/12 Status: Offline Share Posted August 27, 2016 @ExRev at some point you can start to make the case that them allowing their buddy to follow them around or some shit is going against the don't repeat orders rule. But regardless, if what they're doing is disturbing the ability of the game to actually be played, then it is not allowed. That's just common sense (herr derr no such thing as common sense...herr derr go fuck yourself). I don't see any reason to make a special rule against special orders. If nothing else we can specify that the no repeating orders rule also extends to not giving people special privileges round after round. Link to comment
ExRev Posted August 27, 2016 Content Count: 2238 Joined: 03/29/10 Status: Offline Share Posted August 27, 2016 @ExRev at some point you can start to make the case that them allowing their buddy to follow them around or some shit is going against the don't repeat orders rule. But regardless, if what they're doing is disturbing the ability of the game to actually be played, then it is not allowed. That's just common sense (herr derr no such thing as common sense...herr derr go fuck yourself). I don't see any reason to make a special rule against special orders. If nothing else we can specify that the no repeating orders rule also extends to not giving people special privileges round after round. But it's not really repeated orders if you get a troll that goes around like: 1st round: buddy gets freeday. 2nd round: buddy gets to follow CT. 3rd round: buddy gets to play in LR room. Link to comment
Goku Posted August 27, 2016 Content Count: 2589 Joined: 02/05/12 Status: Offline Share Posted August 27, 2016 But it's not really repeated orders if you get a troll that goes around like: 1st round: buddy gets freeday. 2nd round: buddy gets to follow CT. 3rd round: buddy gets to play in LR room. If nothing else we can specify that the no repeating orders rule also extends to not giving people special privileges round after round. Phrasing is key. That phrasing means you can't let your buddy go to pool while the rest go to soccer, then the next round let him go to climb by himself, then the next round follow you around, then the next round have a freeday ect. Link to comment
BlackWhite Posted August 27, 2016 Content Count: 2262 Joined: 02/05/12 Status: Offline Share Posted August 27, 2016 Except nine times out of ten, it's generally a CT allowing his butt buddy to do something like follow him around or have a freeday while the rest of the Ts are stuck in like iso or big cage or something stupid and then given nothing to do all round, every round. I would say it's unreasonable order or giving the same sort of order, even though he may give his butt buddy different order but the aim are the same. Link to comment
Ender Posted August 27, 2016 Content Count: 678 Joined: 10/30/15 Status: Offline Share Posted August 27, 2016 There's not really much we can do to stop people from giving special orders, but it doesn't entirely matter because every time they give special orders they put their special case in risk of getting killed. It's the case of trading a long dull life for a short happy one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now