[Rejected] Trusted Subscribers getting !votekick

[Zeni]

Whether being in TTT, JB or ZE. We all have encountered that one toxic person who EXCEEDS the limit of annoying. I feel that subscriber should be able to have the ability to do !votekick so that one toxic player can realize how annoying they are being etc. Yes Admins are very active but they're certain days when admins dont come on! Tell me what you think?

[nick]

i don't think the BDs would ever trust a subscriber with !votekick because it would be easily abused by regulars who would spam 1, and subs who are smartasses

 

 

and there's no way to cancel a vote without giving the power to subs but then they would be able to stop any admins vote if they make one so no

[Black Rain]

I don't like the idea. Trusted or not it can easily be abused even as a joke. Exactly how can trust be measured between you guys?

[All Ts]

As much as there is that one toxic person there will be that one piece of shit who will abuses vote kicks.

[Zeni]

You guys need to realize that i said TRUSTED. trusted people are trusted by admins. in which it is very unlikely for them to abuse the command.

[nick]

You guys need to realize that i said TRUSTED. trusted people are trusted by admins. in which it is very unlikely for them to abuse the command.

 

We're not going to set up a whole application to have subscribers get the !votekick command. If you want to have a trusted subscriber get this command, tell them to apply for admin lmfao.

[Nuclear Onion]

You guys need to realize that i said TRUSTED. trusted people are trusted by admins. in which it is very unlikely for them to abuse the command.

This'll require higher ups to make a separate flag for people they feel warrant this power. Honestly if someone is this trusted as a sub, they should try to go for admin in the future instead of being told they can use a single vote power.

[Luke]

I disagree with this, similar variations have been suggested before and they've all been declined for decent reasons.

 

Of course we wouldn't like the idea of giving people this power without an application process. I see you have suggested trusted players, however as Onion said they really should just be going for admin if they want this kind of power. It just doesn't seem necessary for me and I believe the alternative of them applying for admin would be a much easier process than the risk of this being abused.

 

The only thing I would think about would be allowing HG's to do some kind of variant, but once again I don't actually think it's necessary.

 

I understand how it could help in situations, but I'd say no.

[Zaraki]

This'll require higher ups to make a separate flag for people they feel warrant this power. Honestly if someone is this trusted as a sub, they should try to go for admin in the future instead of being told they can use a single vote power.

 

This.

 

 

Trust is something you cannot measure. You can punish the person who abuses his/her given power(s) by taking them away, but setting up a procedure for subscribers to gain a minimal amount of powers is a bridge too far imo.

 

Besides.

 

Subscriber costs irl money. You want only Subscribers to be able to gain these these powers when they're found trustworthy?

You're leaving out dozens of non-Subscribers who could easily be trusted with admin (see where i'm going at?) and they won't be able to get something as simple as votekick?

 

Your idea is not something that could fair well in our community. Admin is not a paid rank, so why would a trusted person pay for his powers?

 

Calling in an admin is the best alternative. Making a player complaint is the second best alternative.

[MyHobos]

We've seen some subscribers do some nasty shit, so we might as well make it trusted regulars.

Trusted regulars basically equals admin?

Apply for admin or call one in? xd