Zeni Posted January 30, 2017 Content Count: 131 Joined: 08/16/16 Status: Offline Share Posted January 30, 2017 Allow me to toot my own horn for this Let me just go a bit more into this. From what I understand, you want to give Ts the chance to rebel or not. So, like you said, CTs can camp because it's the only way to be able to tell who's rebelling or not, and then in the highly unlikely chance the CTs live, remaining Ts have LRs. However, this is under the assumption that all CTs will want to do that. Some will choose not to camp and go their own way, which is basically saying HEY TS, KILL THIS GUY while you guys are hiding. This is more than changing rules, it's adding something that SG has consistently said it didn't want for many years. No, it'll become just like forced deathgames were in the first iteration. Deathgames were pretty commonly offered, but once FD happened so often and seemed more like a way for people to get as many kills as they want. Even now in the current iteration, I see people falling in map made death games and then CTs just gunning them down. Gotta get them stats up somehow. Completely wrong. It goes entirely against the roleplay of PB. The moment you say Warday there's no control over who's going to rebel and who's not since you'll probably camp somewhere. CTs are not supposed to give Ts a chance, for example like gunplanting. This is just a disadvantageous shootout with no real place in PB. EDIT No offense, but it took 3 pages of posts before you stopped criticizing the criticism you were receiving to answer any of the problems people had with wardays. Don't quite agree with you - but respect your opinion. Thanks Link to comment
delirium Posted January 31, 2017 Content Count: 5382 Joined: 03/10/09 Status: Offline Share Posted January 31, 2017 Free speech is what we all have, some people can't tell the difference between free speech and selective speech. People consciously and intentionally include rancid hate speeches unto people who don't deserve that. You have free speech - It's called the First Amendment, but you also can proportion your disagreements with less hate and a little more understanding. As for the hypothetical fuel - YOU are the hypothetical fuel, that adds to the fire to JB. @Jake what is your opinion? 1 Link to comment
Frostbitten Posted January 31, 2017 Content Count: 2187 Joined: 08/11/12 Status: Offline Share Posted January 31, 2017 I feel as if a lock is needed until further notice. You guys going on about how criticism is needed/not needed in a discussion thread is really making you look bad imo. Plus you're constantly going off on each other in public when it can easily be handled over PM or Steam Message. I also understand that other people would like to post their opinions on Wardays, but I will not risk another off topic post here. Unless a CA+ says otherwise, this thread will be until a decision is made. 8 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread