When the order "Crouch walk to x location" should no jumping already be implied? 24 members have voted

[Esoteric]

If no jumping were to be implied with orders, this practically means that "all t's freeze" is equal to AFK freeze. Which it isn't, and shouldn't imo. So no, shouldn't be implied

[ExRev]

this practically means that "all t's freeze" is equal to AFK freeze. Which it isn't, and shouldn't imo.

 

 

But again, following the logic of "Follow. The. Fucking. Order." (seriously, how is this THAT difficult people?) how is All Ts Freeze NOT the same as AFK Freeze? If you're spinning around or clicking your flashlight, you ARE. NOT. FROZEN.

 

Again, not saying that "No jumping" should be implied, but for fuck sake can we please have some common sense? Follow the orders given, it's really that fucking simple.

[Esoteric]

But again, following the logic of "Follow. The. Fucking. Order." (seriously, how is this THAT difficult people?) how is All Ts Freeze NOT the same as AFK Freeze? If you're spinning around or clicking your flashlight, you ARE. NOT. FROZEN.

I'm pretty sure when freeze is used in this way, it means to halt, which means to stand motionless. Therefor using a flashlight would be allowed. Spinning around & jumping wouldnt fall under the category of motionless; so that wouldn't be "frozen." However if we were to go by definitions, t's wouldn't be able to talk during an AFK freeze.