LR

[BLUE PANDA]

Hey, so I just want to clear something up. I made a thread regarding this topic before but I am facing some trouble and I am gonna make another thread to just clarify this shit. So during an Lr when there are basically no rules given accept you have to do the Lr obviously and lets say a t goes to medic during his Lr he gave no rules regarding you can't go to medic and the ct gets triggered and kills the t claiming he cheated his Lr would this be a free kill or not because he never gave any rules before the Lr began.

[All Ts]

This thread does bring up something different than normally spoken about. For me healing during a s4s, noscope, etc.. is cheating the LR or atleast it should be?

 

Going to page @Nimmy and @delirium to confirm that notion, then maybe we can get that clarified in the FAQ?

[BLUE PANDA]

I mean it shouldn't be cheating because there were no rules stating you couldn't get healed it would just be a dick move but yeah please get clarification so everyone knows what to do in this kind of situation.

[Greggy G]

From my personal experiences with LR's, when a T would say "no rules" or just doesn't give any, then technically going into medic is not cheating out of the Lr. The fact that the T made it to medic first doesn't mean he's cheating the LR, the CT had the same opportunity to get in medic and camp it out in order to win. This is how I've always seen it done and how I always dealt with it. When a T does an LR and they don't want the CT to use medic he would have to say before the LR begins "No medic." That's why we give T's a chance to state any specific rules like "No medic" before the Lr is accepted if they don't want it. If this situation was cheating the Lr then their would be no purpose of giving T's a chance to create their own rules for the Lr.

 

So for this specific situation the CT was in the wrong and should not have killed the T since the T never stated before the Lr was accepted "No medic." It was a fair play to go into medic and their was no reason for him being killed

[BLUE PANDA]

Thanks Greggy for clearing it up for everyone, also that t who got killed i bet you could tell was me(dun dun daaaaahhhh).

[Bernard.]

pretty sure no medic is implied for the lrs that do damage, like s4s, knife, no scope battle.

[BLUE PANDA]

It doesn't really state anywhere in the rules that during an Lr "no medic" is implied.

[Bernard.]

It doesn't really state anywhere in the rules that during an Lr "no medic" is implied.

 

ive heard a few admins saying that healing counts as cheating for those types of lrs, which is reasonable. there should be a rule saying that

[FLuiD]

I feel like no medic should be implied upon requesting an LR unless specifically addressed or someone says "No rules" as @Greggy G mentioned

[Greggy G]

I feel like no medic should be implied upon requesting an LR unless specifically addressed or someone says "No rules" as @Greggy G mentioned

 

I don't agree fully with this because if someone was to not give any specific rules then that's literally the same thing as a T stating "No rules" before the Lr begins. We shouldn't have to get super detailed with every little situation.

 

If someone does an Lr, doesn't state any rules or state anything at all, then that means their are no rules for the Lr and going inside of medic is allowed, period.