Nate S Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 796 Joined: 11/10/17 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 What does this mean, I see people getting permed left and right for this sometimes, other times I see it never happen. SMAC 0.8.6.0: ConVar sv_cheats violation this is the most recent one I've seen. Link to comment
GG EZ Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 1470 Joined: 08/26/16 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 SMAC 0.8.6.0: ConVar sv_cheats violation just means the person is using hacks and got banned for it 1 Link to comment
Nate S Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 796 Joined: 11/10/17 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 SMAC 0.8.6.0: ConVar sv_cheats violation just means the person is using hacks and got banned for it LOL actaully, a guy got banned for it just before today. Link to comment
Dominic Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 5678 Joined: 01/07/16 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 There's quite a few different violation messages, I believe they're all for cheating and probably just triggered it differently. 1 Link to comment
All Ts Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 4441 Joined: 05/28/16 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 We use a server-side anti-cheat called SourceMod Anti-Cheat. SMAC looks for a bunch of cvars you (the server owners) set up, basically if they're trying to cheat by bypassing sv_cheats (or force anything else for that matter) in that instance they get banned for cheating. They're 100% accurate from what I've heard in the past and have yet to see someone get falsely banned for it. You'll see other ones like fog_enable, r_drawparticles and r_drawothermodels every now & then. 2 Link to comment
MPQC Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 2167 Joined: 03/24/08 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 We use a server-side anti-cheat called SourceMod Anti-Cheat. SMAC looks for a bunch of cvars you (the server owners) set up, basically if they're trying to cheat by bypassing sv_cheats (or force anything else for that matter) in that instance they get banned for cheating. They're 100% accurate from what I've heard in the past and have yet to see someone get falsely banned for it. You'll see other ones like fog_enable, r_drawparticles and r_drawothermodels every now & then. It perm banned me 3+ times while I was working on various plugins. It's not very kind. 7 Link to comment
Beep Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 216 Joined: 10/01/17 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 It perm banned me 3+ times while I was working on various plugins. It's not very kind. It must hate you, and also now I can actually understand what it means now. Thanks @All Ts. 1 Link to comment
Nate S Posted February 14, 2018 Content Count: 796 Joined: 11/10/17 Status: Offline Share Posted February 14, 2018 Thanks bubs @All Ts @mpqdc @Dominic Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now