Jump to content

? servers

? players online

What would you do?

Recommended Posts


  • Content Count:  1438
  • Joined:  03/25/17
  • Status:  Offline

I didn't expect my last post to get responses, so I'm thinking of making this like a mini series if you guys are interested

I love having conversations with people that actually make you think, so I propose this little philosophical thought experiment

If you're familiar with psychology you may know about the "prisoners dilemma". It basically goes as follows:

"Gary and Steve have been arrested for robbing a bank and have been placed in separate cells. Both care much more about their own freedom than about the well being of their accomplice. A prosecutor makes the following offer to each. “You may choose to plead guilty or remain silent. If you plead guilty and your accomplice remains silent, you will go free and I will use your testimony to ensure that your accomplice does serious time (5 years). Likewise, if your accomplice pleads guilty while you remain silent, they will go free while you serve the time (five years). If you both plead guilty, I get two convictions, but you'll have a lesser sentence (2 years). If you both remain silent, you'll both only be serving one year. You need to give me your answer by tomorrow."

So, if you were in this situation, what would you do? Would you plead guilty, while risking taking the higher sentence? Or would you remain silent to try to get the chance of serving the smaller sentence?

 

I'll give my response from a more realistic perspective after a few people have replied :)

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  2579
  • Joined:  02/27/16
  • Status:  Offline

The Game Theory would suggest that to optimize everyone's benefits, we'd both have to predict that the other prisoner is thinking about us and not simply about ourselves. Meaning that to achieve the optimal situation, I'd have to shut the fuck up, hoping that my friend won't talk.

 

This dilemma is great in explaining philosophy and economy. At the same time, nobody knows what they'll pick if it had to happen to them, which is why neo-classical approaches conclude that the average rational person would be snitching on their accomplice. I'd personally risk silence.

Edited by roux
Link to comment

  • Content Count:  2162
  • Joined:  11/26/16
  • Status:  Offline

I honestly would keep quiet because I dont really care what happens to me, so long as my friends and the people I care about get to enjoy their lives and live them happily and to their fullest potential. Me snitching on them would go against that, and would probably just make them angry with me (which is annoying when people dont get mad at me when i do dumb shit). I just tend to care about people and I want to make everybody as happy as they can be even if I dont get to be happy, so I think silence is the best choice for me with the prisoners dilemma

Link to comment

Reply to Thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...