Wreck Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 317 Joined: 06/27/16 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 How do you guys feel about a CT warning shooting with an AWP? Do you think it should not be allowed or do you think its completely fine. I personally think that it is not a good way to warning shot, where there is a chance you can kill someone on accident with just one bullet. 1 Link to comment
kabLe Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 2206 Joined: 08/30/09 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 It's not nice and if you don't hit them in the leg its a freekill so I'd say it's more of a dick move but shouldn't be against the rules. 2 Link to comment
bat Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 361 Joined: 10/06/17 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 A warning shot is 1-99 damage. As long as it doesn't kill the T, it's fine. You can be a dick and leg them, it's not against the rules. If you play AWP on CT you're bad. 3 Link to comment
TheZZL Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 3294 Joined: 10/28/18 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 The same really applies with a deagle (40-60 damage). A warning shot with the awp (imo) is reserved for known rebellers or after a big loss for the CT's. If you end up killing the T it either means they already did something deserving of a warning shot, or just got unlucky. I personally believe it's fine, except when it comes to newer players. However, they end up learning the ropes regardless. 1 Link to comment
Gentoo Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 1583 Joined: 06/19/17 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 AWP warning shots can be very effective when ratio isn't ideal. When Ts inevitably start rebelling, many can be taken down by a single nade. 2 Link to comment
urpalerp Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 824 Joined: 10/15/18 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 Like most people said, it’s just a dick move. But as long as your able to aim and feel confident in your ability to hit someone’s leg, then go ahead, use the awp. Even if the ct did accidentally not hit their leg and end up freekilling a t, then they can just fix the situation by slaying and apologizing. 1 Link to comment
Trazz Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 1987 Joined: 12/24/18 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 Im fine with an awp being used for warning shots as long as its 1-99 damage 1 Link to comment
thump Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 272 Joined: 09/02/18 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 Warning shot people in the head with weak weapons. I think it's pretty fine because like everyone else has already said it does 1-99 damage so it's in line with the rules. I personally don't warning shot with the awp, but when I'm feeling kind of bored I'll warning shot people in the head with a weak weapon. 1 Link to comment
Chad Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 928 Joined: 07/06/19 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 I say let it be allowed, but if you're not an awper, you shouldn't be picking it up. 1 Link to comment
Slavic Cereal Posted August 16, 2019 Content Count: 74 Joined: 05/31/19 Status: Offline Share Posted August 16, 2019 It Isnt Allowed And If It Were To Be A Warning Shot the Best thing to do it with is a deagle Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread