AppleShark Posted October 5, 2008 Content Count: 514 Joined: 12/08/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 5, 2008 (edited) Is this right??? (Or does the processor clock itself in relation to load?) Edited October 5, 2008 by AppleShark Link to comment
Cooki3Monsta Posted October 5, 2008 Content Count: 981 Joined: 05/04/08 Status: Offline Share Posted October 5, 2008 Its correct. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115041 Link to comment
AppleShark Posted October 5, 2008 Content Count: 514 Joined: 12/08/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 5, 2008 Thanks Cookie but what does the Newegg page prove? Link to comment
Dark Torcher Posted October 5, 2008 Content Count: 240 Joined: 05/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted October 5, 2008 thats because you have a quad core cpu-z can only run on 1 core at a time, so if you just run cpu-z normall, it will always run on core 1 (called core 0) to be able to see all cores, create 4 shortcuts on ur desktop to cpuz, and then in each of their properties, add to the target line -core=0 (which means core 1), and -core=1 (which means core 2) and so on but yes it is underclocked, though you could also disabled its extra core if you have no use for that speed, which brings the question of why you bought it in the first place Link to comment
AppleShark Posted October 5, 2008 Content Count: 514 Joined: 12/08/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 5, 2008 (edited) Well I haven't altered its default clock at all :001_huh: Any easy way to reset like changing my multiplier? Edited October 5, 2008 by AppleShark Link to comment
Zero001 Posted October 5, 2008 Content Count: 1230 Joined: 05/17/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 5, 2008 You're all wrong. He has speed-step enabled that's why his multiplier is x 6.0 If your computer needs the power it'll up the multiplier to its normal level. It's just a feature meant to conserve energy. Run something like a virus scan and watch CPU-Z pick up. You can disable speed-step in your BIOS if you want, but it's not necessary. There's nothing wrong with your PC. Link to comment
AppleShark Posted October 5, 2008 Content Count: 514 Joined: 12/08/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 5, 2008 Wow, thanks Zero. I guess you learn something everyday. Link to comment
Dark Torcher Posted October 6, 2008 Content Count: 240 Joined: 05/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted October 6, 2008 i thought he meant if he had successfully underclocked, lol is this the pc you were talking about building, since i would expect you to have already gone thru the bios and checked it all already Link to comment
AppleShark Posted October 6, 2008 Content Count: 514 Joined: 12/08/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 6, 2008 Yes that's the PC I was building and I'm not messing around with clocks until I get my second RAM module back (faulty). I checked temps on everything and when they seemed fine I didn't feel the need to check the BIOS, though i did have a little look around. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now