lorax Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 345 Joined: 05/17/21 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 (edited) The current warning shot is 1-99 which means you can deal 99 damage and it can count as a warning shot, but I dont think a WARNING shot should leave near death. So make having it reduced to 1-75 or 1-50 would make it more reasonable, as i dont see something meant to warn you can make you 1 health from dying. 2 Edited July 27, 2021 by Phoenix_ me being a dumbass Link to comment
sWz Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 971 Joined: 07/09/19 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 Lmfao imagine being an admin and trying to enforce this (ALL) [SG] 20 scrolls : daft why did you shoot baconator for 23 damage retard? that's against the rules its 50-75! guess who's getting slayed next round! 14 Link to comment
Phoenix_ Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 1920 Joined: 05/04/16 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 There are a few big problems with this. 1. It's unreasonable for players- Most people who play JB have silver aim and couldn't control hitting between the thigh and the torso if their life depended on it. If they're using a deagle, imagine the amount of crying if someone got hit for 76+. It's a lot easier to control simply not killing someone as compared to trying to do less than 75 damage. 2. It's unreasonable for admins- This would be the most annoying and persistent thing to enforce. It would feel really stupid yelling at someone for damaging someone for 2 more damage than they are supposed to. Also, I can't really imagine many admins rushing onto JB for rampant too heavy warning shots. I would honestly see that in calladmin chat and laugh. 3. It doesn't bring much effective change- What will this really do? All it does is add more complexity of rules to follow, but you'll still die in 2 shots if you get hit for 51 twice. I understand awp/deagle stomach shots/etc. warning shots are annoying that leave you at 2 hp, but it's really a problem with no solution. I think the fact we allow warning shots is generous enough. Overall, an unneeded change. 8 Link to comment
oSen Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 587 Joined: 09/27/17 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 the only time i've seen a warning shot that actually does 90+ damage is when you are kissing their ass using a p90. Not only does it barely ever happen considering most people use aks deags etc with the exception of maybe an awp, it would be a pain to enforce and really would make no change to the server besides exclude warning shots from a few specific weapons leaving little reason to actually change the rule from what it is now 1 Link to comment
Roddy Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 870 Joined: 05/15/20 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 (edited) 54 minutes ago, lorax said: So make having it reduced to 1-75 or 1-50 would make it more reasonable how do you control the damage you do to them (not including a headshot) 50+ or 75+ up to 99 because it is pretty easy to do 50+ dmg unless you can only shoot them in the feet which is only prob the only way to do 1-50 and for chest for 1-75 which is dumb and don't see a point in this idea. Edited July 27, 2021 by Roddy Link to comment
lorax Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 345 Joined: 05/17/21 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 1 minute ago, Roddy said: how do you control the damage you do to them (not including a headshot) 50+ or 75+ up to 99 because it is pretty easy to do 50+ dmg unless you can only shoot them in the feet which is only prob the only way to do 1-50 and for chest for 1-75 which is dumb and don't see a point in this idea. you could use a torso shot with an ak/m4 deagle in the foot in the leg Link to comment
Kataoka Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 594 Joined: 09/03/17 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 3 minutes ago, Roddy said: how do you control the damage you do to them (not including a headshot) 50+ or 75+ up to 99 because it is pretty easy to do 50+ dmg unless you can only shoot them in the feet which is only prob the only way to do 1-50 and for chest for 1-75 which is dumb and don't see a point in this idea. AWP. Feet. Doesn’t happen often when someone wants to risk it but it’s still able to happen Link to comment
Roddy Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 870 Joined: 05/15/20 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 Just now, Mikey. said: AWP. Feet. Doesn’t happen often when someone wants to risk it but it’s still able to happen awping feet does like 87 dmg to it lowest, and I find the change very dumb (my personal opinion) so I am going to stop posting on this thread any longer Mikey-san Link to comment
Kataoka Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 594 Joined: 09/03/17 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 Just now, Roddy said: awping feet does like 87 dmg to it lowest, and I find the change very dumb (my personal opinion) so I am going to stop posting on this thread any longer Mikey-san It is very dumb cause it’s barely happens cause like Phoenix said they have silver aim and they are gonna miss and just kill the person! 1 Link to comment
sWz Posted July 27, 2021 Content Count: 971 Joined: 07/09/19 Status: Offline Share Posted July 27, 2021 27 minutes ago, lorax said: you could use a torso shot with an ak/m4 deagle in the foot in the leg Expecting CT's to have to aim and shoot at a specific part of the body to be following the rules is fucking absurd when you realize most kids on JB struggle to land shots on people's entire bodies. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread