PotshotPolka

xIWjInz8fqA

That is all.

Thank you for participating in this operation. Please disarm all anti-furry tags at this time. If the enemies of the world return you will be called on once again.

Don't post in here again about it. It's done.

No. You misunderstand. It's Furry related content, which in itself is sexually explicit, but you wouldn't know this, since you probably did not read the first post and continued to post here. Now either stop arguing about illogical and irrelevant "flaming" and drop the furry stuff, or leave.

37 minutes.

Fuck your PMs, kind sir. This is a community issue not to be mediated by a "higher up".

No. We said what was to be said, no more goddamn drama, the furry content was the source of this stupidity, and it will end when it's gone, period.

I'll make a petition asking for the removal of his signature, and other content related to it, sorry if I didn't give you a valid reason to go forum nazi on me.

One hour, no exceptions.

Your post is irrelevant. We already stated we would remove the "anti-furry" content and the controversy would come to an end if you dropped yours, instead you escalated by adding a furry signature, and you are attempting to bog this down with pointless accusations about what is "inflamatory". We have already stated your impression on what you call flaming is invalid. You have one hour to remove all furry content, sigs, etc, or there will be, and can only be war. This is the ultimatum.

I think the guy directly behind her is almost on par.

This thread was something that was to be avoided, but can't be postponed any longer due to the affronts from a certain furry in the community. The following is a brief, logical, and reasonable explanation to his behavior, why it is not tolerable, and why it must cease immediately. "Furries" are people in a supposed sub-culture focusing on anthropomorphic characters (think Tony the Tiger and Micky Mouse, for mainstream characters). The controversy circles around two key points: A (large) portion of furry content is sexually orientated, as is their "sub-culture" in fact. In reality it is not so much a sexual preference as it is a fetish. The reason many furries stir up so much controversy is because they refuse to realize this, and demand acceptance rather than mere tolerance, which they have a right to. Tolerance is understanding that people have sexual preferences, and it is there right to practice them, on the condition they in turn realize that as societal whole, the rest of the community is not interested in it, and is in fact, disgusted when presented with the said "art". To DEMAND acceptance from us is to take our choice in preference away, which is what the said furry has continued to do. He has leaped onto our tolerances, yet demands we go further to accomodate him. So what is the point of this? The said furry is to understand that he is not a holocaust survivor, he was not sprayed with a firehose at Birmingham, he was not mocked and openly attacked for not being heterosexual. The said furry has a victim complex, he demands tolerance, acceptance, and understanding and attacks any that would exercise their right to confront him. It is reverse-censorship he pursues, a double-standard. Imagine that instead of a furry the said person had a foot fetish, constantly talked about feet in the chatbox, had a picture of a foot in his signature, hotlinks feet into the chatbox, etc. Feet, or to digress, anthropomorphic characters in this persons case are the subject of his sexual deviancy, and are to be treated as such. These are the rules, and he has crossed the line, and worse, attempted to blur it. Our demands: Do not post here. Do not ever mention it again. Keep it to yourself, where it belongs, and if you wish, talk to others in private if they are WILLING to speak about the subject matter. Remove the furry related content from your sig, and we in turn will remove ours, and that will be the end of it. Non-compliance with this will mean you acknowledge you do not care about our own rights, and you will be responded to accordingly. Our war is not with furries, but those who would propose and accomodate bullshit.

I'm on the otherside of the state man, over by Daytona.

It was a madlib with his name inserted. Bring on Illuminati '09.

NOOO MAN IT'S HIS MICROWAVE OVEN.

Yeah, that and you could be Stalin or Lenin.

i7 965 is overkill 2 gtx 280s is pretty much overkill, but who am I to talk when I have a gtx 295. Water cooling for that rig is pretty much necessary, since that case COULD NOT keep that shit from catching fire with its airflow. But still dude, if you went through like tiger direct, bought an Antec or Coolermaster full-tower case and bypassed the liquid cooling you could have saved well over 500-1000 euro on your purchase. But its your money (I mean your mom's money). If I had $4000+ I'd buy a liquid cooling case for my current rig and just get a decent laptop, and invest the rest in something productive.

http://www.shockwatch.com/contact.php durrrrrrrrrr

Videocard drivers?

bad link.

I thought Windows required NTFS format though.

Does he mean just for more space or to game off of? Invest in a SATA cable (if your case/MOBO has one for external use). Also, I was just wondering, could you technically boot from an external disc drive if you formatted it to NTFS instead of FAT32? It would still have to be connected to one of the SATA ports on the mobo though right?