Wawa

Thank you for all the work that you've done for this community, Octavarium. Take care brotha!

Ok, so let me make a point here: From Capp'n: From Me: From Spiked: Overall, it does not matter who can or cannot give their opinion and it does not matter who can or cannot see them. Some people are going to be flat-out honest in their feedback and some people are going to be blatantly dishonest for various reasons, this will never change regardless of the system we're using. The BDs are the ones reading in between the lines throughout the entire process and will make their decisions based on that approach, having a different system is not going to change that. In other words, the people who are getting admin aren't being approved because of the system in place, so don't blame the system.

I demand a recount, @capp'n your lawyer services are needed! @Wooper we need memer background checks done pronto!

No matter what the system in place is, it all comes down to the BDs making a decision to either approve/reapply/reject an admin application based on their own opinions/observations, the opinions/observations of the community, and everything between those lines--those are the cut-and-dry means to reach those ends. There isn't really much else that can be done to gather thorough, honest opinions other than through following the guidelines that have been set and maintained by Revenga and the other BDs; there isn't a magical honesty detector that picks up on opinions that are purposely dishonest or just plain bullshit and there's nothing that can be done to prevent them. It all boils down to how the BDs want to make their decisions on admin applications. If their approach is to gather as many opinions from the community as possible about an applicant while encouraging them to be thorough and honest, then that's completely up to them. If their plan is to keep increasing the pool of SAs regardless of how many there are currently, then that's completely up to them. Using an old system, older system, semi-new system, completely new system, etc. really doesn't matter as long as the ends (the decision of the BDs to approve or not) justify the core means (why should we approve or not).

How could you not vote for a potato that is extreme?

I hope everything works out for you IRL. I look forward to seeing you soon, my friend.

[video=youtube_share;rc-19z52Da0]

Go away Rawr.

Pork Roll.

That will definitely happen.

Bump.

If enough people are interested in playing, I plan on creating an entire deck from scratch for the game Cards Against Humanity called Memes Against Steam-Gamers. If you do not know what Cards Against Humanity is, here is a great explanation from an Amazon.com review: After the deck is created, the game can be played online for free and over Teamspeak with up to 20 players per game. I am not releasing any further details at this time because if there aren't enough people who are interested, I will not continue with this idea. Otherwise, more information will follow shortly!

How Does Your Toilet Paper Hang?

good game, much fun

[video=youtube_share;OMINnQNpcnc]

Queen size.

[video=youtube_share;XL752-bVgLs]

Thank you guys from the smooth transition and @MPQC and @floffypus for your hard work and dedication to the community!

You also spelled group wrong. The grammar police are going to take you away Bread!

IMO, you laid everything out crystal clear, and this is most definitely the best direction to go in because it makes the most sense. This community will embrace the change and move on.

It might be worth taking an admin complaint for racism and player disrespect if I ever saw this Ryan guy in our servers

Thank you for the quick response. Personally, I would like to control it individually, but it's not up to me. Anyone else interested in this?

@Liam Brown Is there a conditional that can be added to the current spectator plugin that would allow admins to NOT be listed in the box of who's spectating who (or if admins can just disable it when going undercover)? If so, does anyone else like this idea? This modification would make it easier for admins and undercover admins to not be detected or given away when spectating players who are suspicious of hacking/glitching/exploiting/etc.

[video=youtube_share;ECoGgBBA7fc]

Even a small amount of this stuff will set your mouth on fire, and it isn't subtle either. I believe the main ingredient is cayenne pepper.