Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Nuclear Onion

Legend
  • Posts

    3462
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nuclear Onion

  1. 30 thanks fatty
  2. I never lie either! I think you are just being silly @bethy
  3. Ah OK Why would a map maker make that something CTs can get lol? Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  4. Are these dank? Sure This guy knows I have never said anything mean ever. Please stay on topic. Shut up, Vick Idk what you're talking about You can make it. Sprite sucks either way. Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  5. Retro and James pretty much convert to more than 100 users, right? Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  6. Never Nou Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  7. Idk what @Goku is talking about with the decoys. Besides that I don't feel this map should be removed since its actually pretty fun if the CTs understand the map. Gonna mark as rejected. Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  8. Go for it boss @bethy Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  9. Pretty much sums up my feelings of this thread. Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  10. Pretty much this. We should focus on expanding the community as a whole before pretty much duplicating servers. Plus majority vote and such helps
  11. I mean, that is the real point of this thread so... Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  12. :'( I don't plan on adding a rule to the server when it seems people are still not fully on the same page with the rules we have already. Even if there were no problems with our rules, I still wouldn't consider this idea. You wanna know what other servers do? They play death games every round, have the same exact protocal all the time, and kill you for moving your mouse the length of @Bread's nonexistent dick when told to afk freeze (sorry dad, need to completely specify). They play the most uninspired games too like forcing everyone to type answers to the simplest fucking math equation in chat or the capital of some god forsaken country that literally all but one person has no clue what it is. That's all they do. Every. Single. Fucking. Round. I think you guys can handle sitting in a cage then in a pool for a few minutes with a deathgame under your consent. Along with the fun of rebelling in between if you have the timing and tools for the job. Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
  13. >ends it a day early right when wawa takes the lead #rigged
  14. Eat one, kinda regret it, eat another anyways, hate yourself a bit more afterwards
  15. 1:26 AM - Nuclear Onion: hi

    1:26 AM - Prez: a

    1:26 AM - Prez: b

    1:26 AM - Prez: c

    1:26 AM - Prez: d

    1:26 AM - Prez: e

    1:26 AM - Prez: f

    1:26 AM - Prez: g

    1:26 AM - Prez: h

    1:26 AM - Prez: i

    1:26 AM - Prez: j

    1:26 AM - Prez: k

    1:26 AM - Prez: l

    1:26 AM - Prez: m

    1:26 AM - Prez: n

    1:26 AM - Prez: o

    1:26 AM - Prez: p

    1:26 AM - Prez: q

    1:26 AM - Prez: r

    1:26 AM - Prez: s

    1:26 AM - Prez: t

    1:26 AM - Prez: u

    1:26 AM - Prez: v

    1:26 AM - Prez: w

    1:26 AM - Prez: x

    1:26 AM - Prez: y

    1:26 AM - Prez: z

    1:26 AM - Prez: now i know

    1:26 AM - Prez: my abcs

    1:26 AM - Prez: wont you come

    1:26 AM - Prez: and

    1:26 AM - Prez: sing

    1:26 AM - Prez: wit

    1:26 AM - Prez: h

    1:26 AM - Prez: me

    1:26 AM - Prez: xd

     

    Please report this dad.

  16. What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
  17. If this is a repeating situation, then I'd slay this guy, seeing as though he's just overall ruining the fun for others and could even make people leave just because they can't play. He clearly seems to know what he's doing is just trolling others. Also me changing the grace time later should fix this problem for the future.
  18. I'll change the join grace time when I get back on a computer.
  19. @Banana Joe Sorry for the very slow response, wrote about three response drafts on my phone only to get rekt with them not getting saved. This is probably very poorly written since I've had to rethink what I said a few times. Anyways, I gotta say that I totally get the logical standpoint behind this. I do understand that getting a grenade thrown at you/someone knifing close to you sounds like you have the right to kill them. My opinion is this rule needs to be simple, or else it's very abusable for loopholes and flat out taking advantage of the rule. You will have CTs killing Ts for knifing mid distance saying they felt "the T had an intention to knife." You will also have Ts screaming every time they get killed this way saying they didn't mean to knife or they 'misclicked.' Pretty much the same situations can be brought up with grenades. Another thing, let's say a CT kills a T for one of these mishaps. An admin decides to slay them for free killing, but the confused CT doesn't like the slay since he felt endangered because the nade was too close in their opinion. There's nothing in logs that proves the player had the right to kill them or not. By how the rule is now, you can check the damage logs easily and see if a CT got hurt by the knife or grenade, then the problem is quickly solved then and there. In the end, I feel like changing the rule will do more bad than good. It's been like this since my time here at the least, I definitely remember it being enforced a lot in my days.
  20. One of my older ones, I'd resize it to suffice if it doesn't work.
×
×
  • Create New...