I mean to be fully honest, if that's the way people are playing, then fine. I really don't care how you guys intend to look at baiting, it was always a judgemental rule but at one point somd people wanted me and a few others to go all out fixing already fine rules because they were 'too implied.'
Like really now, do you guys actually need for me to state fully what bom said as baiting if the server seems to already have that handled? I had a feeling from the start people were always going by that rule, and that's completely fine since that's what it always was. (I'm just being a shitter who never really took the time to actually fix it in rules posts, !rules, etc.)
The baiting written now is written as another form of baiting that needed to be stated since it's kind of a different from others. This also prevents the whole 'Oh you hugged me so I can knife you now and get away with it' argument.
The baiting that I didn't write (it's possible I said at one point this didn't exist being the dumb shit I can be at times) was always implied, since that's literally the definition of the word.
I've been kind of ignoring the baiting comments since it seemed like the people in the server goes by both ways already fine, which like I said, made me think having that part as implied be ok with me.
Sorry for the abandonment of that, didn't realize I probably never actually stated that the 2nd part can basically be an implied rule. Sorry for all confusion and the rule fuckery I've been causing in my time as AO.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk