Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Ayjin

Regular
  • Posts

    989
  • Joined

Everything posted by Ayjin

  1. More raffle points pls, these randomz keep stealing my prizesss
  2. Hi, I'm rawrie.
  3. I second this removal because if @Jake 's fat can't fit in a map, it isn't worth playing.
  4. Bye

    You think you can just leave me, after the games we've been through you stupid kid, you get your butt back here in major in ONLINE COMMUNITIES AND PLAY COMPS WITH ME 5EVER. Seriously, Matthewpoo, I'll miss you man, ton of fun playing competitive with you and you abusing me in TTT. It won't be the same without you here. You're the kind of guy I would take on a date first before banging. YOU BEST STAY IN CONTACT WITH ME VIA SOCIAL APPS KID. Much love bro!
  5. Stepped Down

    I do it out of love and compassion for you.
  6. Stepped Down

    Scammed @harpo, one of the first admins I've met on JB and made it stand out and appeal to me. Hope you can come back as soon as possible. Hope to see you around ts and forums.
  7. Wear nothing
  8. All I see is you trashing on admins for not trusting someone's word over having to see it themselves, in my opinion, that's not worth reading. Notify an admin, tell him to go undercover, there you go. If you want to talk about how inactive the admins are or you having more bans than half of them, then I'm going to feel like I shouldn't acknowledge your post. I spend the majority of my time on the servers, even with the schedule my life has at the moment. This isn't source, stop using that as your go to, things have changed, rules have changed, people have changed, so adjust to the change like most people have. Reguardless if that said person stops breaking the rules or leaves when an admin gets on, doesn't that stop the rule breaking for the time? If you're looking for a rule breaking free server, there are none. JB is one of the most active servers, with admins on most of the time to survey over it. Be glad we keep it under control most of the time, and stop complaining about the little time in which admins aren't on. Not all of us devote our lives to this.
  9. http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/forms.php?do=form&fid=4
  10. I'll body slam your existence with a life ending floppy dorito
  11. I love when people said they liked me better before I was admin. Apparently I'm a strict admin lol
  12. JB, met @Longwave and @Elemental, freekilled them a couple of times. Banned 3 times in 1 month, got admin.
  13. Heads or tails Group of T's call head or tails, split up who called heads and who called tails. Left side of the gun is heads, right side is tails. CT throws the gun, whatever side it lands on, that side gets to live. Other side dies obv.
  14. SG Quotes

    "I hate @Nuclear Onion" - Roar "Because I wub you" - @xDoodles :love: :love:
  15. Pistols are still a 1 shot against the head if you don't have head armor. Stop targeting CT's like they are the root of the problem. There's many other issues rather then "bad orders" or "incompetent CT's". Maybe if you gave legit reasons rather than resulting to insulting a certain side everytime. You could get people to heed your reasoning better, rather than looking at it and want to stop reading halfway. As discussed there will be a vote on it as Nuclear Onion said, or maybe even end up adding armor for the T side. (Preferably without head armor)
  16. I actually wouldn't mind if T's had armor. A deagle can warning shot for 74.
  17. Why you result to such a negative way to put it, I don't know, but the CT side doesn't get a handicap. A helmet simply provides an extra safety allowing them to maybe stand still without worrying about instant death. I never said that the T's need to get better, I actually only pointed out the problem the CT's usually have in JB.
  18. The only thing that's messed up with damage notifications is the shotguns, last time they took even head armor off of the CT side, I just sat in a vent as a T, and got 7 headshots with a usp. The head armor gives the CT the assurance that they can stand still for 1 second, knowing they can't just get immediately killed. Without head armor, the T side would become easy. I would maybe side with this if the CT side on average was smart and knew how to play. Too bad that's not the case, there are very few CT's who are actually capable of handling a full server or even T's in general. The other CT's tend to be free weapons in the eyes of the T side. So until we have a stronger presence on CT side (which is probably never), hopefully the head armor will stay so JB doesn't turn into a death match server.
  19. There is nothing wrong with the armor for CT, if they didn't have it, a glock could 1 tap when at the appropriate range.
  20. Once again, I'm trying to get it changed, stop bring up conversations months ago. Thx. You don't decide the rules, cause you don't decide that at all. You barely play JB anymore reguardless. Being that I'm on pretty much the majority of the time, have noticed the problem at hand. Assuming telling everyone to stop complainin is going to work is historical, if that worked we'd never have to have any discussions. Too bad they are actually people, and don't listen all the time. So here's an idea, let's try to help them out, by rewarding them for participating in fun events on JB! That make the rounds go faster! More chances to rebel! Most of all, a better experience on JB, oooo oooor I'll just send them all to a non-death game place every round. Don't worry, we'll switch it up to make sure we don't repeat orders! K?
  21. And that mindset is what keeps people from participating in anything, I'd like that to change. It isn't the "end of discussion". I asked nuclear onion about what he thinks, he hasn't responded yet. If I wanted to get your response, I would've tagged you. I'm trying to get this rule changed because I only see it being beneficial towards the server. You didn't even list why we should keep the rule, you just restated what nuclear said MONTHS AGO. I wouldn't bring this up, if this wasn't a problem. I've been hearing around for awhile now, "what's the point of doing Deathgames or lr's if we always get denied or revoked". So unless you have an actual reason as to why this rule shouldn't be changed. Your input is more than discouraged, it is unneeded. So, going on the "LR tactic" making them freeze, etc. That still doesn't solve the issue of delaying the round. Cause the T, still won't be giving an LR... So back on track, I'd like to know if this could be changed, or your opinion on it @Nuclear Onion
  22. I prefer Nutella
  23. Ok, seeing as I'm honestly tired of everyone in JB not participating in LR's or Deathgames, because their reward is usually taken away from them with a CT saying "Freeday revoked or denied" for no actual reason, I'd like to bring up a question. May we perhaps introduce a rule that if a T is rewarded an LR, and is granted by a CT, (If it's a stupid LR, you can use common sense and discretion) that it can not be revoked. I personally think this had became a plague on our server causing hardly anybody wanting to participate in anything that has to do with a deathgame or LR. Causing the rounds to just go drag out more than needed. I believe this will help all sorts of problems, and hopefully bring out a lot more participation in games amongst the player base we have. It's perfectly understandable to me now, on why they never want LR's or Deathgames. The reason is simple, there NEVER IS A REWARD. A CT ends up killing/revoking whatever was given to the T, how is that going to promote anyone to participate in anything. So I belive if handled and worded correctly. (Along with the judgment of admins) We can impliment a rule as to where T's can not get their REASONABLE LR/Winning the death game reward stripped from them. It will encourage more activity, cut rounds shorter causing more play time for ALL players, and lead to more beneficial orders rather than "go here for the entire round" or "freeday no _____". Also I guess this is our way to replace the fact we aren't allowed to enforce a death game, instead this is our way of promoting them to participate in Deathgames or give an actual LR, instead of delaying the round for all the players. I'm tired. @Nuclear Onion, opinion? P.s. - sorry 4 wall 4 text, just wanted to be as clear as I can in this drowsy mood.
  24. Never experienced this lag spike issue, and tbh, this map is VERY UNDERRATED. Activities consist of ----- - Death run - Soccer - Disco - Jumprope - A proper red light, green light - Gun toss - Roulette/Simon Says - Pool - Hybrid Climb - Disco - Vent that leads outside, disco, or pool. (Probably some other stuff I forgot) Only actual problems that I would point out, is the fact the main cell area is a little small, and getting into armory is easy enough to the point where a CT should always be in it. Besides that, it has what most of our maps are lacking and should be played more. It's just a matter of the community only wanting to play maps they already know all the secrets, teleporters, etc. I don't agree with the removal, and as stated before, never once in my 6-7 months of playing have experienced this lag spike issue. EDIT - The vote is about adding the map, not removing it. @Nuclear Onion
×
×
  • Create New...