Jump to content

? servers

? players online

fib

Regular
  • Posts

    160
  • Joined

Everything posted by fib

  1. 36 players is too many, so if we can't reduce the number of people, let's at least change something to maintain order. i like the idea of more players as there are constantly more trying to join. i can admit i have caught myself many times trying to auto-join to for a spot, but the chaos is much worse than before, and i'm starting to think the sacrafice of order for a few more players isn't worth it honestly I don't really have an alternative, maybe just a few less players, cap it at ~30 or so, but if not then there has to be some kind of change cause it's really ridiculous. The worst part isn't the beginning of the round, or the end of the round, it's the middle of the round, after the first orders are given and the t's are allowed off mic. it's nearly impossible with all of the ct's and t's talking at the same time for a single person to give a coherent order, and sometimes even the "off mic" order doesn't to much cause the ct's are the ones being obnoxious as well. I've been contemplating the idea of wardens, at least maybe test it for like a week to see how it goes. I know the server has been built on freedom of all ct's to give orders, so maybe some kind of flexible system? I was tossing the idea around of a couple main guys who have to earn the right to talk. I've played on servers where you have to play for an hour or something like that before you can even use the mic, so maybe some kind of system where you need to earn it? to sign up on the forums or something? It's vague i know but the idea i'm really grabbing at is less players on the mic. I'd like for more leniance on "all t's off mic" as well. 15 seconds is a little short being as you have to repeat yourself a few times before you get everybody's attention (including you're own ct's. also i understand that it's approximate, but i got beaned at by some new guy because i kept them off for more than 15). I remember when it was like maximum of a minute, which i think is fine, if not that at least 30 seconds will be adequate as long as it's not being abused. (e. g. "ALL T'S OFF MIC" being used every time one of the ct's gets spoken over) any suggestions appreciated, i just want a little more order. pls be gentle this is my first suggestion
  2. going w/ goku on this one, if i saw a t go into the vent the second i did, instinct says to kill- i wouldn't think twice about if he was close to it or not, i'd think that he saw me go in and was attempting to kill me fresh off the teleport. although i probably should, i just wouldn't. simply not the first thing that comes to mind
  3. Funny Pics

    why can't i see these
  4. so does this include all ct facilitated games like Simon says ? or first reaction- last reaction for example. the deaths are contingent upon t failure
  5. click b8 title, ez. But seriously, hear me out If you've played JB long enough, you have seen a situation where a ton of t's die early, and there's like 2 minutes or so left, and the final t doesn't want an LR. Although the situation is rare, that means my idea will be rare as well. It's very obnoxious and a huge waste of time, so i was thinking this: ct's can force a deathgame on the t. How ever - 1) there must be only 1 t remaining 2) the ct(s) HAVE to do it with him (makes things a little more fun, probably wont happen. just a beta beta .0001 version idea) 3) the t gets make his choice of the death-games available, not the ct I have already thought of: 'what if there are like 30 ct's and they try to force the deathgame that THEY want and not the t.' to this i'm yet to think of a solution, but beta rules usually take a little bit to get used to. would love to hear your thoughts edit: idk how to do a poll, would be nice if somebody could inform me privately
  6. lmfao this was hilarious
  7. shit clutch compilation

    @nick I mean in this one specifically i would have done that but the song was less than two minutes long so i didnt have a ton to work with but i see what you're saying
  8. shit clutch compilation

    @Elemental I didn't know that having the n word in the song was racist no matter what
  9. shit clutch compilation

    @nick yeah i get that you didn't like it but do you have anything actually constructive besides "the compilation is average"?
  10. Funny video dump

    @Post ah fuk well nobody woulda seen it anyway there's a hundred pages xd
  11. Funny video dump

    if you're bored, come check out these videos i found. under two minutes each, and worth the watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d38ir9JE7u8
  12. i wouldn't call this meme dank, however it is very spicy. in the coming weeks i plan to see a dank meme from u, yung halo
  13. CS:GO Frags

    meant to put one of these in front > my bad mate, was a failed meme. who are u ? u been here like 8 times longer than me but i never seen u on any servers
  14. gotten a lot of requests (like 2 lol ) to make an actual frag movie and not just a compilation so here u go, took me a while to make. feed back appreciated ^-^. https://youtu.be/jgPZQtBXmPQ edit: ok i realized waht the shit i did to make it all blurry so the new one should be up soon edit 2: ok heres the REAL one:
  15. CS:GO Frags

    joined 2008 never heard of him
  16. Got permission from him to post this thread. All T's friend died today, 10/24, his story is here: http://imgur.com/gallery/WuQpb Rest in peace, mate.
  17. For some reason the actual questiom was not the main idea of some people's responses, so let me answer it for you: 9 times out of 10, yes. However if you know the right people it can be any period of time the higher ups want. But as you can imagine 1 month isn't that long to decide if somebody is fit to run a community or not. If I had to answer id say for the most part no it's not required but under 3 months probably won't get you far.
  18. third fragmovie

    @BloodyKiller i plan to make the next one w/ a bit more effort
  19. third fragmovie

    thx men xd @Cam
×
×
  • Create New...