Since Delirium said he wasn't gonna go through the OP in a post, I'm gonna swoop in on it. To keep things sane, any rules that are already on the server will be removed.
Might be doctored, but it's pretty direct.
Ct's can give out a max of 3 penalty rounds.
Probably should define "penalty rounds" for us
Ct's are not allowed to punish all t's for 1 t's actions.
But it's fun. This would be hard for admins to enforce, because the CT could say something along the lines of "Man I'm so mad H4X0R keeps killing me, all Ts go to iso, for no reason." The rule would complicate CTs ability to give orders, which they already struggle with.
If there is a death game for example 50/50 ct's have to type the answer in ct chat.
Its only honorable to do so, and I agree this would keep CTs honest, at least to their teammates. This is a good idea.
CTs can not troll the t's by saying words that sound similar (for example Simon sells jump when they are supposed to say Simon says jump)
Simon say is also something that's been discussed far too much. At this point, me as a player, I just see simon says as a CT discretion based game (same with what's for dinner, joke day) and pretty much avoid it like the plague.
T's have 5? seconds to do the command the ct's want them to if they don't do it in 3 seconds they get warning shot and if they don't do commands in another 3 seconds they can be killed.
This one is a gray area, but here is where reason comes in. The rules don't specifically say how long you should wait, regs on server recently have been saying 5 seconds, and the only place I found that even says a time is from EARLY 2017.
Ct always has to explain a death game shortly but well explained.
This isn't explicitly in the rules, but usually happens anyway.
As ct, you are NEVER allowed to team kill.
Neither team is.
Terrorist RULES
You are not allowed to LR on free days unless ct's say you are allowed to
Why though? LR exists to shorten round times.
In LR's you need to give fair rules (No rules that give an advantage to one player)
As both players have to follow the rules, I would highly impressed if you could find a situation where one side benefits more.
T's are not allowed to tell where other t's are! No matter what. Covered above
Team killing is allowed but if you team kill ct's can kill you.
I live for the day a T teamkills a CT. This rule would be replacing an admin action with a CT action. My brain tells me somehow a CT could abuse this to farm kills, but I digress. Admins handle this well.
If you are rebelling you need to be active if all the other t's are rebelling.
This removes LRs from the equation, enables a CT to freekill easily, and forces an action on the T side that is not an order. This is not a good idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLUGINS [
not my department, sorry
NEW DEATH GAMES
I have made several death games popular on this server including what's for dinner (originally named the food game)
Here are some new games that I think people would enjoy
Always love new DGs, simon says makes me want to neck. The thing about DGs is that getting a T to accept it is key. Once they've accepted that they're gonna die, you can do damn near anything with them.
yes
Quiz
The t gets to chose a category and the ct asks a question in that category (the same thing as it was with 50/50 ct's have to type the answer in ct chat) If the ct doesn't know a question in that category the can ask for a new one.
Shaggy says
The ct asks a question and the T has to say yes or no with no doubts they have to answer directly. The wrong answer = death (before ct's say the question they have to type yes or no in ct chat)
basically what's for dinner, but yes
The odd one
3 t's stand in a triangle and look away from each other and then a CT says the odd one. The one with the most glances dies.
The odd one with gifts
Works exactly like the odd one but there's a gift, the one with most glances can choose to keep or give to someone else ct's are not supposed to say what the gift is till the t has said if they want to keep it or no, For example: Ivan wants to give the gift to Ulper and ulper gets killed because the gift was death.
only because this would be awful to actually enforce, im gonna say no, but I may get corrected.
I'm happy to see you have suggestions to improve our server, but I've got two gripes. First, you definitely should have combed through our pre-existing rules to weed them out first. Giving us ideas we already have doesn't help at all, and frustrates the people that actually bothered to read it. This would also give your post more merit, as it sorta feels like you don't know the rules. This leads into my second gripe, that being this feels like you copy pasted PlayPark's rules onto our forum. So, I went to their page, and did a little translating myself. It turns out that you did not simply copy and paste everything, you did go through the trouble of taking out the numbers, and the bits about warden(playpark has wardens), and give a little more clarity to some rules (only example of this I saw was the ghosting bit). Now, I don't know Swedish as much as I'd like, so I don't know how direct the translations are, but some of these look like they were pulled straight out of google translate, as I was getting the exact same terminology and wording as appears in your post, in my own google translate. Don't get me wrong, sometimes you did reword awkward sentences, but not every time.
TL;DR: we aren't looking to do the same thing as other servers, thank you for the suggestion!