thump

Congrats! Well deserved promotions

This happens when CTs take fo extremely early in the round like bozos from what I've seen

3 seconds is enough for Ts to kill atleast 1 CT

The T isn't always gonna drop the gun as soon as he picks it up and a CT isn't always gonna have the reaction time to discern what the T is going to do in that situation. Ts would gain a huge advantage if CTs had to wait for them to drop it because a T that always rebels and has decent aim will just kill the CT that is watching them waiting for them to drop it. If the T does drop the weapon immediately then I agree the CTs should be nice and pardon them but that isn't always the case and the CT doesn't always have the time to think about that. Situations like these are definitely unfortunate but considering how T sided that server is I don't see it as the biggest of problems. It's already been talked about so many times I don't see a point in bringing it up anymore and I don't see a situation where I would support changing the primary rule unless something significant were to be brought up. I don't see this working in any way.

When there is a good ct on this happens anyways. I honestly would not like to see a warden at all. It's the main thing that brought me to this server initially and what makes the server so unique. A good ct can take over the round anyways without having to be a warden. Even when the server starts getting 30+ people of course it's gonna be hard to control them even with a warden cause the warden isn't gonna be omniscient and know everything that is going on around the map. This would lead to some CTs in bad spots to just die and give the Ts an easier way to rebel since only a single CT can give orders. The Ts win almost all of the rounds anyways. The only time they don't is when there isn't a good rebeller on T side and it doesn't matter how many CTs there are if they are good at rebelling since they cause chaos within the CTs and give others a chance to rebel. The way I'm seeing it, adding a warden system would only help the Ts rebel, but I could be missing somethings since I'm so biased against it and would appreciate having it pointed out if anyone is willing to.

Maybe only allow it to be used once a certain amount of CTs join. Also, there should be a way to ban people from being warden and make it so only those with mics allowed to be warden. I honestly don't think it would be a good idea considering how T sided the server is. The 1 CT isn't gonna be able to tell everything that's happening and might not be able to give the right orders at the right time especially in a server with 30+ people where it can get chaotic. I would not personally like to see a warden plugin implemented. Edit: Also what uno said. The server is unique because it has no warden and that's what brought many players here and what brought me here.

I guess I've never noticed it cause it only happens to CTs, but recently I've seen it happen to a couple Ts and only recently. I'd imagine it's because they already have a deagle like haxor said and it just empties the clip instead of getting rid of all of their ammo, but having it on T side gives them an advantage since they're allowed to cheat their LR and kill the CT while the CT would be basically defenseless. I probably won't be able to get a clip of it since I have absolutely no way of recording anything reliably.

In S4S there's a glitch where Ts receive 7 shots and keep thos shots making it easy for them to rebel by spraying their lr partner down. This just started happening and I've only seen it twice.

I'm not sure if it's just me, but I think I remember people saying they have the same problem, which is on avalanche when playing the map progressively gets dimmer as if my gamma is being turned down. It doesn't get too dark that I can't see anything, but it gets dark enough where its hard for me to see other players some times. It resets whenever I either die or swap players while spectating but then starts doing the same thing to me. This makes avalanche really unenjoyable for me since its so hard to see.

Tell me that again and maybe I'll magically get enough money to upgrade my system.

Problem with that for some people is they don't have Nvidia cards and can't use shadowplay. For people like me that have a shit pc with integrated graphics it's basically impossible to record anything on JB or TTT anymore.

https://gyazo.com/906fbb9b90f78e61c45ccb050f14508d I'm hitler

We lost TJ McConnell too so the team is done. He was the best player on the team no cap. Kawhi leonard really won Toronto a championship then just dipped lmao

If I remember correctly, I think it was on spy v spy the old one without soccer and the entire outside area not the new one.

This happened to me when I was only sent one lr. Basically as soon as the menu popped up I died for not choosing one in time.

I'd like to add that I enjoyed the Zelda music

If I know the T is clueless I'll wait for them to drop it, but giving them 3 seconds is way too long. The game mode is already so T-sided that giving them the slightest advantage in situations like these would allow good players to kill at least a couple CTs.

Most of the JB people don't have the braincells to comprehend 128 tick. Also, most people on the server suck anyways. Just cause the tick rate is changed to 128 doesn't mean everyone is gonna start 1 tapping the fuck out of everyone. It would be completely useless.

Tell the Ts to unstack and freeze. If they're close enough to the guy rebelling and allowing him to stack with them thats kind of their fault.

Just 1 tap the guy with the gun lmao

You know what is a joke, you ever taking an AP Exam.

I think it's unethical and unnecessary. We shouldn't play god by making sentient living creatures.

It isn't exactly necessary. While we have learned a lot and it has benefited society in the past, there are new ways to test these things. I had a debate topic in my AP Gov class where we had to choose a topic to debate with another group and mine happened to be on abolishing testing on animals. I happened to be on the Pro side of this argument even though I didn't really care in the beginning. After reading in to it, there are many ways to test things that doesn't involve animals. For example, cell cultures can be created by scientists to test products, as well as donated human tissue, even if it is not 100% healthy. Also, the use of cervical cancer cells has been used to test products. Another method is the use of computer simulations. All of these methods are cheaper and more humane than animal testing. A lot of people probably don't know about these methods and believe testing on animals is the best solution to finding cures and things, but its not exactly cost effective. A lot of the products tested don't even make it to consumers and animal cells are slightly different from human cells. These small differences can mean a world of different effects on people. TL;DR animal testing can be replaced with a variety of methods that are cheaper and more effective. Animal testing is a thing of the past and we should move on to more modern and effective strategies.

Mayonnaise