THIS WAS WRITTEN POST ORIGINAL PARAGRAPH
I agree with what Andre is saying (click the arrow to read the whole post, i didnt want mine to be too long) BUT i think the fact is...Andre, how long had the old system been there for say Itend, Leech, Obez, and others mentioned there? and this 1? My point is that those people will show again (not the ppl them selves just that type in general) so i think that is more a time difference. But as i state in my original paragraphs, it is not the bad apple but the quality over all:
Red Tampon
Cloud Strike
raven maniac
Tcp-Kill
Astrum
VenomousFate
tinkerbell
Jaffa
Paul
Killermidget
HighSky
Ambulancia
Beth
Mystique
Jager
LVG
GarfieldH
Daze
Henda
broncoty
Edo
Falcon04
James
VirDeBello
Jasper
The Green Bastard
Silent
Repeat
Blank
Modgers1
Luxz0rz
juku
PotshotPolka
andre1028
Itch
Mikey
Jewpiter
2fast
Third
Huwajux
Crimson
Spartan
TofuShop
Tyrant
Cranks
EspioNage
NOW how many of these (higher ups) were in the old system... and i dont wanna hear its all time... Beth was a CA so fast my head spun, so my point is that though a lot of SHITTY admins came from the old system, but it had a lot of good ones too.
I still wait to see when a "new" system admin will rise to the worthy-ness of higher up status. Also when the first "new" system admin becomes part of your examples, again it is the quality of the admins coming out not the number, or the major fuck ups.
so i ask, who that is new system could you ever see being a higher up?
ORIGINAL PARAGRAPH STARTS HERE
________________________________________________________________________
i think that the main problem is that admin complaints are often shitty, no proof, and so on... this causes bad admins to stay admins, ALSO the quality of admins now and then is/has always been a problem. Now how they get admin is less the problem in my mind seeing as this is proof enough i hope:
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=9848
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=9689
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=12699
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=18492
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=18092
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=16481
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=19443
http://www.steam-gamers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=23271
THE reason for all these is that it shows that not all admins in either system are good, nor bad. That is my main concern, as a supporter i vote to give people power greater than my own...i take this seriously and this proves why votes need a conclusive reason, in either system... that way people dont get admin just cause... or you support me i support you/ lick your balls.
That is my problem with BOTH systems, QUALITY, something we lack often, but needs to improve IMO. now i support this idea, but i want if it gets looked at the AOs BDs Red and Haggard to look at it as such, its not the system but the quality of admins the system brings out.
that is all
-thx