Bubblez

tony is def right about that bruh, now u got a story to tell haha. Get well soon bruhh !

thats the thing with pb though, like i stated in the other post, u have players that are concerned about other players that aren't even complaining about it. its fucked up. It use to be players only complaining when they got mistreated, now they feel the need to complain about other players without even knowing anything. Cancerous af.

Again, I only do this to my friends, not randoms. So its ALL G.

@Goku @Delirium I would never do this to randoms, ever. Just to clarify, both Tomato girl and Samuel Jackson are my friends in game and they were cool with it. It was all for shits n giggles. Kiesh was creating a fuss over it for no reason just because he just won't get off my dick. It's sad because now we have players complaining about other players being treated when they aren't even being harmed in any way. Delirium did nothing wrong. Sorry I just saw this or I would have clarified this up if I saw it earlier. there is only very few peeps that got real hate, the rest are just fools that are mad cuz i deleted em off steam for being annoying af. Most of em fuck around with the hate. Makes it all more fun though.

i didnt break no rule, i always told them not to jump. that was initially when the rule came in which i cleared pretty fast. @Goku sounds good.

What's up everybodyyyy, I was wondering if we could take back the rule where when you tell the terrorists to crouch/run/shiftwalk somewhere, its implied they DO NOT JUMP/RUN/SHIFTWALK. This was always how the Prison Break server worked since Day 1 and somehow now its not implied. I'm all for giving them warning shots because it ain't something worthy of killing them for, but it's stupid how you have to clearly say no jumping standing or running when giving the orders. Now, you got so many terrorists jumping for the fuck of it, only to receive a warning shot. And if they get multiple warning shots from different Cts, they bitch about it even though they know what are they are doing is clearly asking for a warning shot. In my humble opinion, this would narrow down the bitching and make it less cancerous then it already is. Where the AO's at? -B

OOOO u a AO i forgot haha. yee i was trippin' out when I heard this too!!!

So I ran into a situation today that I believe needs major clarification. A Ct agreed to do a knife fight with a T. While they were doing their thing, another Ct decides to shoot the T in the head with an awp. Asteria slayed him next round but quickly slayed herself because she said a T is kos any time he hits a CT. I told her the slay was legit and she shouldn't have slayed herself. But she showed me a post and asked StunningJam. I spoke with Stunningjam and decided to make up this thread so I can see the point of how this rule was created. I remember distinctively that Nuclear Onion stating that the rules on Prison Break have not changed since 2012 and I want to make sure that this is still legit. Could I get an AO+ to state whether it is allowed to interfere in someones LR and kill the T. Sincerely, B @Caution @Nuclear Onion @Wawa @Asteria @Bread