Jump to content

? servers

? players online

BoM

Banned
  • Posts

    3150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

Everything posted by BoM

  1. . The near only reason for this order's existence is, "face the back of your cell and afk freeze". This is for weapon checks, and has been used by CTs for many many years. If the rule is being used/abused outside of this, then we can make that clear. If people aren't warning shotting, then they can be banned. If we need to clarify that people can move their screens around, that can be done too. Not playing in the server in some kind of protest.....isn't the answer.
  2. This isn't a terrorist negotiation to get you on the server, so why don't you explain to us all why you think this way and how its actually made PB un-enjoyable for you. I can't imagine it comes up that often, and its essentially the same as regular freeze from what I've seen in most of the threads. Not playing over a single rule that I honestly don't see get enforced that much seems absurd, just looking for some clarification... EDIT: So literally the problem is the AFK manager? You move your screen like a fucking cm and it stops the AFK manager...
  3. Always how I've thought of it, I've heard the team-killing argument as well though. I don't think it would hurt to make it against the rules if people feel strongly against it, TBH I don't see the situation come up that often.
  4. get a better one.
  5. I'll repeat myself again in saying there is a lot of gray area and what ifs. All of that can't be defined in a few sentences of an faq or motd, and not everyone is going to come on the forums to read lengthy discussions. Honestly, yes some of the rules can be more clearly defined or discussed, but there will always be confusion on a case by case basis (depending). Admins at some point just have to use their head to determine if the player is disturbing the gameplay, because that is ultimately the reason we ban most people. If its something that is ruining gameplay and/or breaking rules, then its more than likely punishable under one of our many rules. Its up to the admins to figure exactly how it would fall under a given rule, and if the argument of the ruining the gameplay makes sense. This is how admins in PB and other servers have functioned for a long time IMO, rules are clear, but have wiggle room. Its the application of common sense in most cases really.
  6. That is wrong, so let me explain: Baiting is basically doing something that a CT would never do if they're actually trying to stay alive, therefore being A. Stupid or B. Intentionally taunting (AKA BAITING) the Ts. This can include: -Standing on a Ts head -Putting your back to a group of Ts(EVEN IF YOU'RE NOT KNIFING) -Running through a condensed group of Ts, i.e. there is no possible way you would make it through there without getting knifed. -sitting in a doorway near Ts (like in the kitchen doorway in razor), without a purpose -The obvious running into a T while you're knifing. As I've said on handling rules like this in the past, it comes down to admin discretion and includes a lot of gray area. There are cases where the CT might just be stupid, and not realize they're about to die with what they're doing. There are also cases where you know this person plays CT a lot and well, and then is suddenly walking back first into a group of Ts in lets say isolation. If the situation that the CT is putting themselves in makes no logical sense, and is clearly just to taunt the terrorists, then you are baiting them. It really is in the definition of the word, but apparently that has been forgotten over time. Now a CT doing this once, should not warrant a reaction from admins, but someone who is frequently taunting CTs should be punished accordingly. If you guys disagree with this, I'd like to hear why to be honest. Blatantly taunting the terrorists is pretty rude and doesn't really lead to your objective. The main objective of the CTs is not to kill everyone, because you win at the end of the round as long as you're alive. The goal is to keep order and stay alive, which is the complete opposite of what your'e doing if you're wasting your time baiting.
  7. buy a tower. problem solved why? save $$$, same product
  8. Marching band, what a l0ser xd (I preferred concert band)
  9. THANKS FOR WASTING MY TIME MAKING ME SCROLL DOWN THE FUCKING SCREEN. I fucking hate you -_- EDIT: Anyways this is just a missing .wav file. It worked when the plugin got installed originally if I recall, but who knows what happened with files getting fucked up/fucked with over time. You just put on the jihad sound file on the server/fastDL (I have it somewhere if you can't find it) and then If I recall you edit: "sm_jihad_postsoundpath" in the config, unless I'm thinking of an older version. @Nuclear Onion be a doll?
  10. Give them the fucking helmets. CTs suck without helmets. Pistol headshot is op. Honestly harder to see if Ts even have a gun in CSGO compared to CSS.
  11. Who is....wooper?
  12. Goodbye friend, nice working with you over the years. You always seemed to have a busy life (even if sometimes it wasn't voluntary ), so its good you have time to commit to that now.
  13. Solid F. you get a thanks
  14. PAUL AND SPIKED!!!!!!!!
  15. I am torn on this one. I definitely know what you guys are talking about with rounds being cut way too short sometimes, but at the same time 7-10 minutes without an admin there to slay a delayer could turn out to be disastrous. I'm thinking max of 7 minutes might be okay, but I wanna observe how effective having those two more minutes would be before I sign off on that decision. Will probably go along with some other minor changes and map adds and removals if we do end up implementing a round time increase.
  16. Idk why tbh. Now we're stuck with you.
  17. There were much more critical comments, actual discussions about the person, and people strongly advocating for or against. So yeah...
  18. Most people there would've voted yes if a ban appeal from a complaint he made hadn't come about during the application. This is a situation that would not come up normally, doesn't really properly represent the problem at hand. Also, while yes people did leak the info, privacy of the application isn't in question, but the honesty in posting. When admin apps were private people really dug in if they didn't think the person deserved it, there was much less filtering.
  19. Two girls, easy choices. why even make the poll.
  20. Supporter

    Supporter was phased out, all perks being transferred to subscriber+. All previous supporters received the supporter ribbon in recognition of their support for the community.
  21. Mysique is grill, more votes for grill!!!!!
  22. the..........right...one. then we can talk
  23. Welcome

    Sounds good. Always good to see older players coming back.
  24. Welcome

    That is an old name, my my. Did a double take. Hello!
×
×
  • Create New...