LegalSmash

luxors, Britain is suffering an acute version of the political correctness that the US suffers from daily. The United States has in the past 30-40 years taken a very "nonwhite assistance" stance, even though the majority of the impoverished in the united states are made up of lower class working whites. Blacks and immigrants bitch more loudly, and people with money feel better about giving to "the others" especially after watching some tearjerky episode of oprah where they talk about Jim Crow and Lynching. London has turned into Londonistan, and Europe into Eurabia. Plain and simple, you guys are going through a MUCH faster versions of what we have been going through. I think thats what Polka means. As for Euro Racism, I strongly believe that the whole of the continent will soon embroil itself in another war... you guys have been hating and killing each other for the past 5000 years. Its just the natural order of things. France dislikes Krauts, and the Krauts dislike the surrender monkeys. When the Jerries are bored with golf and shit porn, they invade the low countries, England hates EVERYONE because they are removed by the channel from the otherwise "asshole to bellybutton" condition of the rest of the countries.

Mine is the T-34. Nice tank. You guys?

Its a LoLrcaust

I found this email I sent to a friend back in 2005... enjoy. Are you tired of paying $39.99+ a month for cable TV channels that you dont watch? I am personally sick of the shit. I used to have cable, in all its glory, at 49.99 a month, with internet bundled in (54.00 mbps) and it was great. I always resented the fact that i had 12 fucking homeshopping channels, bet, cmt, mtv, and all that other shit i cannot stand in a "bundle" as if they are doing me a favor. I hate channels that I dont pick, yet am forced to pay for. I think its a form of communism. If a channel cannot make it on its own, it probably should not be broadcasting. One day, the particular special i was on ran out, and they gave me a bill for 96.00. I saved the money, and got rid of cable. I was going through fucking withdrawal for the better part of a month, and still sometimes get the shakes from it. I dont like not being able to watch law and order or some good late night boxing, or stargate sg1. No longer was i paying for home shopping, univision, BET, MTV, CMT, Disney, WGn, PAx, etc. , etc. BUT i lost ESPN (only way i can watch the noles in DC), USA (with its law and orders and wrestling), comedy central (everything), swim, spike, discovery, sci fi (i miss stargate) and about 10 other channels that I REALLY liked. I hate network TV, its shit.. who wants to be a millionare, deal or no deal, etc. it all makes me want to take some pencils, shove them in my eyes and swirl... It almost seems as if they take the ABSOLUTE WORST channels and programming they can possibly get, and shove them at us like bad cheese. I want my channels back, but I cant justify paying 96 a month for that and the internet while in law school, or AT ALL. I watch teh occasional show on winamp shockcast, but its not the same. So, I started looking around and found that recently the FCC was suggesting ala carte Cable TV... this would be great, IMHO, 1.99 a channel, pick the ones you want, etc. Of course, some channels, specifically the ones that are bundled would not get chosen and go out of business.. but I really believe this would be a good thing... they suck and shouldnt be around. What do you all think? Do you really think that it is possible, perhaps even beneficial? Would you go with ala carte Cable format? What are the benefits and or the drawbacks? Well, I for one, welcome the idea. For too long have we been quagmired in the abortion that is cable television, whether it be territories of operation, companies, monopolies, etc. The list goes on. If we have orbiting satelites, how on earth can we not beam a signal into mississippi or missouri? Why must I pay 96 a month in DC, when the exact same package in the great state of Florida is a startling 45 dollars a month? What is causing the disparity? Well, If there is going to be a disparity, I really believe that I should be able to choose 10-20 cable channels at a reasonable rate of 29-35 dollars a month. I dont want amazing premium bundles (14 HBO variants, etc.) I want: 1. Espn 2. Comedy 3. USA 4. Sci Fi 5. CNN 6. FX 7. Spike 8. Cartoon Network 9. History 10. Discovery 11. The learning Channel 12. basic (ABC, FOX, NBC, etc. network stuff) MAYBE if it was reasonable HBO1 just because i really like their original shows. Is that really too much to ask? An opportunity to watch MY channels, and not the same hip hop star singing the SAME tired ass song on 5 different channels and having to stomach the insult of knowing that you are paying for it? I dont think it is. I think its time the FCC took notice and started working for the people that pay their salary. Because NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE should have to pay for channels that suck. AND ANOTHER THING... UNCANCEL SG1!!! I LIKE STARGATE!

That is due to all the liberal white guilt flying around.

Nice Happy Bday dude. Those are REALLY nice.

No. Actually, there are like 5 threads on this very issue. The content of the statement is clearly different.

What a cute kid. My dog is named Lacey.

Not in the manner stated above, Magical/Mystical Negro is actually a literary, film, and poetry device: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_Negro Obama is listed as one particular usage. Word is not used in a racist, divisive, or otherwise reprehensible fashion, therefore not bannable.

You have an Xbox, that is part of the problem, also, XBL subscribers took a referendum and decided to voteban you, forever. Maybe its the kind of connection you have?

it puts the lotion on its skin, and then it gets the hose again.

??

spammer

I am a PC and I'm not an elitist fucktard - You post your I'm a PC and X NAO!!

ya lava

WHAT?

The age agreement limits legal liability due to incapacity to actually form the contract that is inherently formed by using paypal to pay for admin... there,a real reason why it should remain 16 and/or up. The voices are also annoying, but that is besides the point, because there are so many goddamn micspammers in Prison break and escape II US at 8 PM that it borders the noise produced in a chinese nail salon.

I feel like going on a Taco Bell binge right now.

How about: Steamgamers: 'Dem gama'z gotz yellocake!

So Im walking my dog, and it gets angry at EVERY black person it sees. The dog is from indiana, and has probably never seen a single black person, but its pretty damn hilarious.

While they had superior tanks, their rifles, battle kits, boots, grenades, and rifle ammunition was of an inferior quality: The United States entered the war with the M1903 as its initial service rifle for a period of less than 2-3 months in combat prior to the introduction of the M-1 Garand Service Rifle. The M1903 is a bolt action 30.06 rifle, comparable to the general service rifle used by the Wermacht Heer soldiers, the Karbiner 1898, a bolt action rifle that utilized a 5 shot "stripper clip". The M-1 Garand was the first semi automatic battle rifle used, had an 8 round "bandolier" clip, which could be fired at high speed with relative accuracy, its only drawback being the inability to reload the weapon mid bandolier clip, and some issues regarding sand clogging the rifle's action. The Germans employed the MP 38 and 40 generally as their assault weapon, ranging from 20 to 32 rounds of 9 mm ammunition. The weapon suffered from jams and malfunctions due to the positioning of the ammunition clip and the soldier's constant use of the damn things as bracing handles... in addition to this the gun was damn inaccurate, only really effective at close quarters. This gun, however was made in vast quantities because it was made of pressed metal parts, a brand new concept for weapons. While the American Thompson Machine gun was inaccurate at range, its 45 caliber shells were much more potent, and the weapon was less prone to jams. The drawback was that the thompson was expensive as hell, costing somewhere around 20-30 dollars (1940 money, when a soldier made 60 a month), PER firearm. The germans did not have a real "match" for the m-1 until the German army came upon the semi automatic G-43 "gehwer 43" rifle, which was arguably a close match to the M1 but like many other german weapons was produced far too late in the war and in too small a quantity to truly have an appreciable effect on germany's win ability. Their infantry crewed AT weapons, such as the PAnzershrek and Faust were SICK, bc they were using shaped HEAT charges, something brand spanking new at the time, that could break through the puny US armored vehicle's side pretty quickly. Thing was, we just had a shitload more tanks...

Good God, are you downloading with a mortar and pestle? I think its somewhat disturbing that the germans are as underpowered as they are. Their assault tanks are made for close combat in buildings and their panzers are pure antiarmor, but they have little to no staying power. Yesterday, I took out one of polkas tanks with a lieutenant with a bazooka and two assholes with a bren gun.