Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Huwajux

Legend
  • Posts

    4198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Huwajux

  1. Try banning Mysti and getting away with it. That's how badass and above the rules I am.
  2. Always

    ?
  3. GOOD LORD! You failed.
  4. Haha that shits pretty good. Loved the truck part and the zambies!
  5. "He's got a purty mouth"
  6. [YOUTUBE]FPOoVA3HdDo[/YOUTUBE]
  7. Ohshi-

    Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaate.
  8. So's your face.

  9. Yar it be Arthas tha Lich King!

  10. lol fag...

     

    oh wait I mean AO! ;>

  11. lol Owned

    3:48 3 strikes! PERM BAN!
  12. Is Snake still doing these? They're fucking awesome.
  13. lol Owned

    That guy's a fucking beast.
  14. Congratulations Suri! :O
  15. It be a mystery to me...
  16. Sorry to say mate, but it's been taken down. It's just our lazy tech team haven't removed it from the !servers list yet ;). I'm not sure about its future prospects though, it was a relatively new mod.
  17. I do believe my comment was taken in a positive sense. Just to clarify...it wasn't...
  18. It's Arthas from the game World of Warcraft. Basically he's the Lich King (the one in my signature) if you aren't familiar with the series.

  19. Oh my, I didn't realise the butthurt was this serious. If you want it removed then very well, if any higher up reads this then remove it because it appears resentment is being directed at me. Edit: I think the reason tink made that thread in the announcements about going off forum join date was because of me and anyone else who might have requested it. I assume they hadn't considered the criteria for it yet, and so afterwards tink made the thread. If this is the case I don't really want to circumvent the rules that are now in place so remove it if it causes this much commotion. Edit2: lol I knew this kind of thing would happen.
  20. How dare you!? Arthas is the most ossim character evar. >:[

  21. Jesus Christ, I've already made my point clear in other threads similar to this one. If the apparent 'abuse' causes no advantage/disadvantage disparity, is well-intentioned and the individuals involved all consent, who gives a flying fuck? Other than that, I feel that a proportion of this entire clusterfuck of a 'debate' is partly down to poor organisation. Without being critical of the higher ups, and putting the 'bias' argument aside, if decisions weren't carried out in such a careless manner then this thread wouldn't even exist. With this being taken into account, an official response has (finally) been given by the higher ups who now aim to address the issue. Anyway, I'm just repeating what has already been said either by myself in previous threads, or by other people in this one. I look forward to hearing what the plan of action is and hopefully it should end this ongoing drama.
×
×
  • Create New...